[General] separate the inertial and gravitational aspects of mass

[Hodge John]

VivianI’ll repeat.The experiment can stand-alone. The ONLY model that isconsistent with the observation is the STOE model. The paper describing thederivation of this model is found in the references. The derivation requiresthat inertial and gravitational masses be found in 2 different constituents ofthe universe. The explanation of the Hodge experiment doesn’t work without theseparation of the types of masses. This is not dissimilarly to accepting the equality ofinertia and gravitational mass because the proportionality is needed to makeobservation models work.  The STOE substitutes the constant proportionality of the 2constituents in particles which is accounted in the gravitational constant. In physics, the acceptance of the postulates through a modelis done by experiment.  You don’t have to like the model, but a light model shouldexplain the observation of this experiment and Young’s experiment. Hodge 

    On Sunday, June 5, 2016 7:51 AM, Vivian Robinson <viv at universephysics.com> wrote:
 

 Hodge,
I see nothing in those references that suggest any difference. If you wish it to be accepted, please state your case clearly from experimental observation, as distinct from inferring it from a theoretical interpretation.
Cheers,
Vivian Robinson. 


From: General [mailto:general-bounces+chipakins=gmail.com at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org] On Behalf Of Hodge John
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 11:42 AM
To: general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org
Subject: [General] separate the inertial and gravitational aspects of mass Vivian Robinson:I suggest the following experiment does separate the inertial and gravitational aspects of mass. Diffraction experiment and its STOE photon simulation program rejects wave models of light http://intellectualarchive.com/?link=item&id=1603 STOE assumptions that model particle diffraction and that replaces QMhttp://intellectualarchive.com/?link=item&id=1719 The proposed photon model predicted this experiment. Some of the required postulates to make the model match experimental observations are to separate the inertial and gravitational mass. No other model of the photon or of diffraction fits the observation. The diffraction model also explains the “walking drop” observation of Fig. 5c in Bush,~J.W.M., 2015,The new wave of pilot-wave theory, Physics Today, 68(8), 47http://newfos.org/sites/default/files/uploads/documents/Pilot_Waves_Phys_Today_Aug_2015.pdfwherein the inertia of the medium allows the wave to reflect and influence the drop that caused the wave. Compare Fig. 5c of Bush with Fig. 1 of “Diffraction experiment …” Hodge  



_______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at jchodge at frontier.com
<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/jchodge%40frontier.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
Click here to unsubscribe
</a>


  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20160605/f0b2ff16/attachment.htm>