[General] a quantitative measure of inertia (not inertial mass)

[davidmathes8 at yahoo.com]

Rich,
Would this paper be appropriate to address the inertial frames inside and outside of any electron model. Inertial mass is not the only one to consider. Quantum mass may vary. Gravitational mass is often considered invariant. Given the TEQ model with FTL, you may want to address the issues of transluminal frames, variable c frames, and FTL frames. 
"Electron Inertial Frames"  or simply "Electron Inertia", either which will demand a  rigorous effort with some restraint. 
For an inertial mass of E/c^2, see Woodward's Transient Mass equation which actually uses this form. Also check on Hoyle-Narlikar linearized GRT. You may want to check with Fearn and  Woodward at CSU Fullerton. 
Jim's not doing too well with his health. Try Fearn. Be patient, mid-terms are near. Check on Fearn's recent papers.
Non-inertial reference frame
Inertial frame of reference

E/c^2 may not be sufficient. One may have to address energy density E/volume-c^2 instead of just E/c^2. 
Williams' Dynamic Theory
Dynamic Theory Flow Chart of 5D Mathematical Physics


For FTL, energy density may prove challenging. Ti-space theory may be required. See Meholic and Froning who have models. For a 5D energy density model, see Pharis Williams theory, 

Best regards,
David 
      From: Richard Gauthier <richgauthier at gmail.com>
 To: Chip Akins <chipakins at gmail.com> 
Cc: David Mathes <davidmathes8 at yahoo.com>; Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion <general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
 Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2016 10:00 PM
 Subject: a quantitative measure of inertia (not inertial mass)
   
Chip and David,
    I’ve been working an article expanding the idea of the origin of the electron’s inertia that I introduced in my short article on this on academia.edu. I want to complete it more or less and polish it a bit over the next week or so and then put in on Academia.edu and hopefully get comments on it, from you both as well as from any of the other “nature of light and particles" folks. I’m proposing a basic quantitative measure of the inertia of the electron that is different from its inertial mass, and from which its inertial mass is derived quantitatively. The quantitative measure of inertia covers both the resting and the relativistically moving electron. As a side benefit it also gives the photon an inertial mass E/c^2 (this is controversial in inertia literature but is accepted by Martin in “Light is Heavy"), even though the photon doesn’t have any rest mass. I haven’t settled on a title yet. Currently it’s “The electron’s inertia is its total momentum”. That might generate some interest and curiousity: “That's dumb, what about a resting electron whose momentum is zero? It obviously still has inertia.” The key idea is TOTAL momentum, internal plus external. Another possible title is “The origin of the electron's inertia based on the spin 1/2 charged photon model of the electron.”  ho hum, maybe a bit too long...
      Richard


   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20160302/b5fbb7d7/attachment.htm>