[General] DrBroglie wave
Eric Reiter
unquant at yahoo.com
Thu Mar 3 23:52:22 PST 2016
Let me introduce myself, Eric Reiter. I presented last August in San Diego. I have been following these discussions, and would like to join in. I do beam-split coincidence experiments with gamma and alpha-rays, and have accompanying theory. My work leads to the accumulation hypothesis that I argue has been poorly understood and rejected prematurely. When I beam-split a matter-wave (I use Helium alpha-rays) I can see detection pulses in two legs of the beam-splitter at rates exceeding chance. This tells me that the matter-wave can be spread out, divide like a wave and can give two detection events for a single emission event. This is not about violating energy conservation, it is about understanding a pre-loaded state at the detector.
Another interesting diffraction experiment with helium supports my position:http://xrm.phys.northwestern.edu/research/pdf_papers/1999/doak99.pdf
They report both a particle-like non-cancellation and a wave interference signature at the detection plane. My position is that particles do not cancel out.
In another test, a neutron double-slit test by Zeilinger reported interference at the low rate of one every seven seconds. http://members.ift.uam-csic.es/bellido/cuantica/articulos/RevModPhys.60.1067.pdf This seems far too low a rate to consider particle phases canceling out, or some kind of ensemble effect.
I have studied many experimental papers concerning wave-particle duality, for both matter and light.
I believe this is relevant to the deBroglie wave discussion.
Thank YouEric Reiter
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20160304/84d10fea/attachment.htm>
More information about the General
mailing list