[General] Proposed photon wave functions

[John Duffield]

Viv:

 

Doubtless you’ve already seen Martin van der Mark’s light is heavy: https://arxiv.org/abs/1508.06478. It’s about light in a box. The electron is a photon in a box of its own making. Photon momentum is resistance to change-in-motion for a wave moving linearly at c, electron mass is resistance to change-in-motion for a wave going round and round at c. Annihilation is like opening one box with another, whereupon each is a radiating body losing mass. All of it. Then there’s no boxes left. And no need for any Higgs field.  

 

Regards

JohnD

 

From: General [mailto:general-bounces+johnduffield=btconnect.com at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org] On Behalf Of Richard Gauthier
Sent: 06 October 2016 14:13
To: Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion <general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
Subject: Re: [General] Proposed photon wave functions

 

John and Vivian and others,

   Yes, inertial mass must be defined by F=ma and F=dp/dt as Newton defined it, though he couldn’t explain what causes it. It is caused by a particle’s circling internal momentum, as I derive in https://www.academia.edu/25641654/A_New_Derivation_of_Eo_mc_2_Explains_a_Particles_Inertia , which is attached.

    Richard

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20161006/fc3ab298/attachment.htm>