[General] HA: HA: Gravity

[Dr Grahame Blackwell]

Dear Chip, Alex, Albrecht, Wolf,

With regard to Chip's observation (below) on 'gravity/charge field?':

You (and others in the group) may find it interesting to refer to my paper 
in
Kybernetes, Nov 2011: 'Cosmic System Dynamics: A Cyberneticist's Perspective
on Gravitation' [Vol 40 Issue 9/10, pp 1319-1330].

In this paper I derive a direct correspondence between the composite 
'electric-charge' field (as opposed to net charge carried by, e.g. three 
quarks forming a nucleon - this difference is absolutely crucial) and the 
universal gravitational field, including the phenomenon generally referred 
to as 'curved spacetime (which I show to be, in effect, what might be 
referred to as a quality of 'texture' of the universal electromagnetic (aka 
gravitational) field.

This perspective on that field, deriving initially from the recognition of 
'massive' particles as localised* configurations of waveform electromagnetic 
energy ('photons' for convenience), serves to explain every aspect of what's 
referred to as 'gravitation', showing this to be in fact just a more 
detailed view of what we refer to as 'electric charge').  Every feature of 
the Equivalence Principle can be traced back to this underlying construct.

[* 'localised' is in fact an over-simplification of the nature of material 
particles, a consequence of our own limited perception.  A fuller 
consideration shows that the very concept of 'localisation' is in fact 
misplaced, that particles are in fact 'alocal', to borrow a word from Bohm. 
Our very notion of 3-dimensional space (and indeed 4-dimensional space-time) 
is a limitation of our own sensory organs, and processing of signals from 
them - presumably for very sound evolutionary reasons - one that we need to 
overcome if we are to fully exploit the potential of this amazing universe.]

[As an aside, this perspective also casts serious question on the need for 
(i.e. existence of) the Higgs Field (and associated boson) to explain the 
concept of mass.  Given the questions hanging over the whole Higgs thing, 
this would seem to be another point in favour of the charge-based notion of 
gravitation.]

Best to all,
Grahame


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chip Akins" <chipakins at gmail.com>
To: "'Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion'"
<general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2017 2:07 PM
Subject: Re: [General] HA: HA: Gravity


> Hi Alex
>
> I have modeled this effect that spin has on surrounding space.
>
> My work was to calculate the magnetic moment anomaly of the electron. And
> the solution is very straightforward.
>
> So I think this spin influence on surrounding space is significant. But I
> did not call it gravity. I considered it to be part of the charge field.
>
> Your work in this area is interesting, and I will study it more.  Thank
> you
> for the link to the article.
>
> Chip Akins
>