[General] HA: HA: Gravity

[Chip Akins]

Thank you!!!

Will read.

Chip

-----Original Message-----
From: General
[mailto:general-bounces+chipakins=gmail.com at lists.natureoflightandparticles.
org] On Behalf Of Dr Grahame Blackwell
Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2017 1:57 PM
To: Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion
<general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
Subject: Re: [General] HA: HA: Gravity

Attached.

G

========

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chip Akins" <chipakins at gmail.com>
To: "'Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion'" 
<general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2017 5:10 PM
Subject: Re: [General] HA: HA: Gravity


> Hi Grahame
>
> Is it possible for you to send a copy of 'Cosmic System Dynamics: A
> Cyberneticist's Perspective on Gravitation'?
>
> Chip
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: General
>
[mailto:general-bounces+chipakins=gmail.com at lists.natureoflightandparticles.
> org] On Behalf Of Dr Grahame Blackwell
> Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2017 7:02 AM
> To: Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion
> <general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
> Subject: Re: [General] HA: HA: Gravity
>
> Dear Chip, Alex, Albrecht, Wolf,
>
> With regard to Chip's observation (below) on 'gravity/charge field?':
>
> You (and others in the group) may find it interesting to refer to my paper
> in Kybernetes, Nov 2011: 'Cosmic System Dynamics: A Cyberneticist's
> Perspective on Gravitation' [Vol 40 Issue 9/10, pp 1319-1330].
>
> In this paper I derive a direct correspondence between the composite
> 'electric-charge' field (as opposed to net charge carried by, e.g. three
> quarks forming a nucleon - this difference is absolutely crucial) and the
> universal gravitational field, including the phenomenon generally referred
> to as 'curved spacetime (which I show to be, in effect, what might be
> referred to as a quality of 'texture' of the universal electromagnetic 
> (aka
> gravitational) field.
>
> This perspective on that field, deriving initially from the recognition of
> 'massive' particles as localised* configurations of waveform 
> electromagnetic
> energy ('photons' for convenience), serves to explain every aspect of 
> what's
> referred to as 'gravitation', showing this to be in fact just a more
> detailed view of what we refer to as 'electric charge').  Every feature of
> the Equivalence Principle can be traced back to this underlying construct.
>
> [* 'localised' is in fact an over-simplification of the nature of material
> particles, a consequence of our own limited perception.  A fuller
> consideration shows that the very concept of 'localisation' is in fact
> misplaced, that particles are in fact 'alocal', to borrow a word from 
> Bohm.
> Our very notion of 3-dimensional space (and indeed 4-dimensional 
> space-time)
> is a limitation of our own sensory organs, and processing of signals from
> them - presumably for very sound evolutionary reasons - one that we need 
> to
> overcome if we are to fully exploit the potential of this amazing 
> universe.]
>
> [As an aside, this perspective also casts serious question on the need for
> (i.e. existence of) the Higgs Field (and associated boson) to explain the
> concept of mass.  Given the questions hanging over the whole Higgs thing,
> this would seem to be another point in favour of the charge-based notion 
> of
> gravitation.]
>
> Best to all,
> Grahame
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chip Akins" <chipakins at gmail.com>
> To: "'Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion'"
> <general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
> Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2017 2:07 PM
> Subject: Re: [General] HA: HA: Gravity
>
>
>> Hi Alex
>>
>> I have modeled this effect that spin has on surrounding space.
>>
>> My work was to calculate the magnetic moment anomaly of the electron. And
>> the solution is very straightforward.
>>
>> So I think this spin influence on surrounding space is significant. But I
>> did not call it gravity. I considered it to be part of the charge field.
>>
>> Your work in this area is interesting, and I will study it more.  Thank
>> you
>> for the link to the article.
>>
>> Chip Akins
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________