[General] HA: HA: Gravity

Sun Apr 23 14:35:29 PDT 2017

Hi Grahame and others,
  I think it’s important to find a causal link between fundamental particles with mass-energy and the creation of spacetime so I congratulate you on your publication in this area. Coincidentally I am working on an article which also attempts to make such a link. In the meantime I refer you to an earlier article “A transluminal energy quantum model of the cosmic quantum” at  https://www.academia.edu/4429777/A_Transluminal_Energy_Quantum_Model_of_the_Cosmic_Quantum <https://www.academia.edu/4429777/A_Transluminal_Energy_Quantum_Model_of_the_Cosmic_Quantum> or http://www.superluminalquantum.org/cosmicquantum <http://www.superluminalquantum.org/cosmicquantum> which proposes a first quantum particle of the universe, along the lines of Lemaître's comment “If we go back in the course of time we must find fewer and fewer quanta, until we find all the energy of the universe packed in a few or even in a unique quantum”, from The Primeval Atom: An Essay on Cosmogony. 
     best wishes,
          Richard

> On Apr 23, 2017, at 11:57 AM, Dr Grahame Blackwell <grahame at starweave.com> wrote:
> 
> Attached.
> 
> G
> 
> ========
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chip Akins" <chipakins at gmail.com>
> To: "'Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion'" <general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
> Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2017 5:10 PM
> Subject: Re: [General] HA: HA: Gravity
> 
> 
>> Hi Grahame
>> 
>> Is it possible for you to send a copy of 'Cosmic System Dynamics: A
>> Cyberneticist's Perspective on Gravitation'?
>> 
>> Chip
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: General
>> [mailto:general-bounces+chipakins=gmail.com at lists.natureoflightandparticles.
>> org] On Behalf Of Dr Grahame Blackwell
>> Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2017 7:02 AM
>> To: Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion
>> <general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
>> Subject: Re: [General] HA: HA: Gravity
>> 
>> Dear Chip, Alex, Albrecht, Wolf,
>> 
>> With regard to Chip's observation (below) on 'gravity/charge field?':
>> 
>> You (and others in the group) may find it interesting to refer to my paper
>> in Kybernetes, Nov 2011: 'Cosmic System Dynamics: A Cyberneticist's
>> Perspective on Gravitation' [Vol 40 Issue 9/10, pp 1319-1330].
>> 
>> In this paper I derive a direct correspondence between the composite
>> 'electric-charge' field (as opposed to net charge carried by, e.g. three
>> quarks forming a nucleon - this difference is absolutely crucial) and the
>> universal gravitational field, including the phenomenon generally referred
>> to as 'curved spacetime (which I show to be, in effect, what might be
>> referred to as a quality of 'texture' of the universal electromagnetic (aka
>> gravitational) field.
>> 
>> This perspective on that field, deriving initially from the recognition of
>> 'massive' particles as localised* configurations of waveform electromagnetic
>> energy ('photons' for convenience), serves to explain every aspect of what's
>> referred to as 'gravitation', showing this to be in fact just a more
>> detailed view of what we refer to as 'electric charge').  Every feature of
>> the Equivalence Principle can be traced back to this underlying construct.
>> 
>> [* 'localised' is in fact an over-simplification of the nature of material
>> particles, a consequence of our own limited perception.  A fuller
>> consideration shows that the very concept of 'localisation' is in fact
>> misplaced, that particles are in fact 'alocal', to borrow a word from Bohm.
>> Our very notion of 3-dimensional space (and indeed 4-dimensional space-time)
>> is a limitation of our own sensory organs, and processing of signals from
>> them - presumably for very sound evolutionary reasons - one that we need to
>> overcome if we are to fully exploit the potential of this amazing universe.]
>> 
>> [As an aside, this perspective also casts serious question on the need for
>> (i.e. existence of) the Higgs Field (and associated boson) to explain the
>> concept of mass.  Given the questions hanging over the whole Higgs thing,
>> this would seem to be another point in favour of the charge-based notion of
>> gravitation.]
>> 
>> Best to all,
>> Grahame
>> 
>> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Chip Akins" <chipakins at gmail.com>
>> To: "'Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion'"
>> <general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
>> Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2017 2:07 PM
>> Subject: Re: [General] HA: HA: Gravity
>> 
>> 
>>> Hi Alex
>>> 
>>> I have modeled this effect that spin has on surrounding space.
>>> 
>>> My work was to calculate the magnetic moment anomaly of the electron. And
>>> the solution is very straightforward.
>>> 
>>> So I think this spin influence on surrounding space is significant. But I
>>> did not call it gravity. I considered it to be part of the charge field.
>>> 
>>> Your work in this area is interesting, and I will study it more.  Thank
>>> you
>>> for the link to the article.
>>> 
>>> Chip Akins
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
> <Cosmic system dynamics.pdf>_______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at richgauthier at gmail.com
> <a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/richgauthier%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
> Click here to unsubscribe
> </a>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20170423/6f553f85/attachment.htm>