[General] Your and Marmet's papers

[Hodge John]

Thanks.Digesting these will take a few days. A scan suggests these will help my inquiries.ThanksHodge 

    On Friday, December 15, 2017 11:13 PM, André Michaud <srp2 at srpinc.org> wrote:
 

 Hello Hodge,When you write "could your and his model of  electron and photon be that the photon/electron is made of magnets and the vortices" I think that you correctly relate the magnetic field with two charges.My answer is definitely yes. And I think that this could work in my model, at least, your vortices could possibly represent the varying intensity of the E fields as they cyclically vary in intensity.If you look at equation (14) in the last paper I referred Richard to:https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/gravitation-quantum-mechanics-and-the-least-action-electromagneticequilibrium-states-2329-6542-1000152.pdfyou will see that the photon E fields is made of 2 components, whose common E field definition is drawn from my paper ("Field equations for ..."), and is also shown as the second equation (13) , both of which cyclically morph into a single B field, whose definition also comes from the ("Field equations for ...") paper.Now this is not obvious in equation (14), but both electric components cyclically oscillate in opposite directions with respect to each other from a maximum distance set at (lambda alpha)/(2 pi) at maximum intensity to zero distance at zero intensity when the B field reaches max intensity. You can se a representation of this cyclic motion with this image (Figure 9) in my paper on the de Broglie photon):The paper for the de Broglie photon is here:https://www.omicsonline.com/open-access/on-de-broglies-doubleparticle-photon-hypothesis-2090-0902-1000153.pdfSince these 2 components of the photon E field always are moving in opposite directions, either away from, or towards each other, then your vortices applied to the varing intensity of the opposite charges as they move would make sense in my view.Best RegardsAndré ---
André Michaud
GSJournal admin
http://www.gsjournal.net/
http://www.srpinc.org/ 

On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 22:06:03 +0000 (UTC), Hodge John wrote:
 Andre:Thanks for the reference to Marmet's paper ("Fundamental nature ...") and you paper ("Field equations for ...").The vortices seem very interesting to my model ecause my plenum is non-viscus. I lthink his description of diffraction of photons doesn't work - especially for the single photon case.More to the point - could your and his model of electron and photon be that the photon/electron is made of magnets and the vortices ( I really like the vortices in my model -just still trying to apply) . The prime issue of the Poincare stress is solved and the "hollow" aspect is gone. I think the other issues can be solved if the rotation direction of the electric vortices are opposite (how to define direction) for positive and negative charge.Could this work in your model?You'll notice I'm "out of the box" , also. My diffraction test is the 2 Hodge experiments and the Afshar experiment that reject wave light models.Hodge_______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at srp2 at srpinc.org

Click here to unsubscribe
  

   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20171216/9e016eae/attachment.html>