[General] quanta

[Wolfgang Baer]

mach"s principle and work by Sciama has made a good argument that 
inertia is a gravitational equivalent to the magnetic force

Sciama's argument was later show to be equivalent to general 
relativity.. In simpler terms inertia is a field property. What is 
unsettling ?

this requires the "space" (aether)  to be the cause of inertia.

sounds ok to me.

Wolf

Dr. Wolfgang Baer
Research Director
Nascent Systems Inc.
tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
E-mail wolf at NascentInc.com

On 2/6/2017 10:24 AM, Hodge John wrote:
> Chandra
> I feel a bit uncomfortable about where we seem to heading.
> There is the experiment. The simulation reqires a wave in a gravitational aether type medium. The unsettling part of this is that this requires the "space" (aether)  to be the cause of inertia. Matter has inertia because of the space between bound elementary particles.
> I followed the recent discussions on inertia. I'm thinking about this and the experiment result now without a direction.
> If the discrete quanta can do as the simulation does, it may solve my inertia problem. Howver, if the only thing it does is solve the schroendinger equation, well Bohm does that too.
> Hodge
> _______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at Wolf at nascentinc.com
> <a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
> Click here to unsubscribe
> </a>
>