[General] quanta

[Richard Gauthier]

Hi Al,
   It seems much simpler to derive in a few lines the inertial mass of a circling photon-like-object particle model with rest energy Eo from the photon-like object's internal circulating momentum p=Eo/c  (which resists with an inertial mass value m=F/a = (dp/dt)/a =(wp)/(c^2/R) = (c/R x  Eo/c) /(c^2/R) =  Eo/c^2 any force F= dp/dt applied to the resting particle’s circling photon-like object), than to bring in the whole universe and general relativity. I thought Sciama’s approach required the speed of gravitational influence to be infinite.
      Richard

> On Feb 9, 2017, at 11:06 AM, af.kracklauer at web.de wrote:
> 
> Hi all:
>  
> On this topic, check out:  "Gravitation and Cogravitation" O. D. Jefimenko,  ISBN: 0-917406-15-X.  He has a couple other books too on E&M, etc.
>  
> I read through it once some time back---seemed good to me.
>  
> Best,  Al
>  
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 08. Februar 2017 um 20:36 Uhr
> Von: "Wolfgang Baer" <wolf at nascentinc.com>
> An: general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org
> Betreff: Re: [General] quanta
> mach"s principle and work by Sciama has made a good argument that
> inertia is a gravitational equivalent to the magnetic force
> 
> Sciama's argument was later show to be equivalent to general
> relativity.. In simpler terms inertia is a field property. What is
> unsettling ?
> 
> this requires the "space" (aether) to be the cause of inertia.
> 
> sounds ok to me.
> 
> Wolf
> 
> Dr. Wolfgang Baer
> Research Director
> Nascent Systems Inc.
> tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
> E-mail wolf at NascentInc.com
> 
> On 2/6/2017 10:24 AM, Hodge John wrote:
> > Chandra
> > I feel a bit uncomfortable about where we seem to heading.
> > There is the experiment. The simulation reqires a wave in a gravitational aether type medium. The unsettling part of this is that this requires the "space" (aether) to be the cause of inertia. Matter has inertia because of the space between bound elementary particles.
> > I followed the recent discussions on inertia. I'm thinking about this and the experiment result now without a direction.
> > If the discrete quanta can do as the simulation does, it may solve my inertia problem. Howver, if the only thing it does is solve the schroendinger equation, well Bohm does that too.
> > Hodge
> > _______________________________________________
> > If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at Wolf at nascentinc.com
> > <a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
> > Click here to unsubscribe
> > </a>
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at af.kracklauer at web.de
> <a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/af.kracklauer%40web.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
> Click here to unsubscribe
> </a>
> _______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at richgauthier at gmail.com
> <a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/richgauthier%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
> Click here to unsubscribe
> </a>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20170209/857e55de/attachment.htm>