[General] paper "Modeling the photon"

[Chip Akins]

Hi John Hodge

 

This is an interesting approach you have suggested.  I have not reviewed the photon or electron using this approach.  I am working on diffraction, refraction, and “interference” but the math modeling is of course time consuming. So it is taking some work to model these effects.  So far the results are very encouraging.

 

I can to this idea by reviewing the concept which was explored a hundred years ago by Lorentz, Lord Kelvin, Poincare, Maxwell, and several others, and comparing that to the ideas generated by this discussion group.  What has evolved is a model which occupies 3 dimensional Euclidian space, and yields the observed properties, including the quantum nature of particles, and the perception of relativity.

 

I will think about you suggestions and the behavior of photons (and electrons), and explore the ramifications.

 

Thank you.

 

Chip

 

 

From: General [mailto:general-bounces+chipakins=gmail.com at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org] On Behalf Of Hodge John
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2017 3:32 AM
To: general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org
Subject: [General] paper "Modeling the photon"

 

Chip:

RE: your papers "Modeling the photon", "What is light", and "On electric charge".

 

I'm looking to model polarization, reflection, and refraction. Your "Modeling the photon" may be a path. Consider a photon is a column if dusk magnets where the energy of the photon is proportional to the number of discs in a photon. The photoelectric effect suggests each has energy of $h$. The magnetic axis spinning perpendicular to the direction of motion seems to give your spinning wave. The magnetic field is spinning and induces the spinning electric field. But the coulomb field in the plenum (space) may have the infinite speed while maintaining the speed of the electromagnetic signal (photon) at $c$. Maxwell's equations could be rewritten with the basic unit being the magnet rather than the electron. 

 

The Stern-Gerlach experiment produces an alignment of the photon's magnetic axis and the appearance/interpretation of "spin" of 1 (not really spinning because the external magnetic field aligns the photon). Here I distinguish what the experiment actually is versus the model interpretation (may be false) of angular momentum. If objects (polarizing films) can do the same, polarization, reflection, and refraction can be explained. 

 

Your model suggests a way to explain polarization, reflection, and refraction. If so, this explains some difficulties with the STOE model of galaxy redshift.

Please comment. Can this be?

 

Are you working on diffraction and interference for your model?

 

Hodge

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20171027/d4d2383b/attachment.html>