[General] Space as a CTF

[Roychoudhuri, Chandra]

Very interesting thoughts, John!
Keep it up and move forward.
Remember, I postulate that all the forces are different kinds of potential gradients  (“curvatures”) around the self-looped field-particles in the CTF. Of course, I have borrowed the concept from Einstein’s “gravity is a curvature of space” and have generalized it to get rid of “exchange particles for different forces”.

Mathematically structuring the self-looped, in-phase doughnuts (Torus?) will be a critical step forward.
I also intuitively believe that charge is an emergent property out of the dynamics of the field-particles. But, I have not been able to visualize the exact structure that gives + and – discrete charges.

Chandra.

From: General [mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org] On Behalf Of Hodge John
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2018 3:30 PM
To: Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion <general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
Subject: [General] Space as a CTF

Chandra
I found myself revisiting your "Space as a complex Tension Field" paper.
Perhaps the vortices are charge. Different vortices make + and - charge and the number of charges the intensity of the electric field. The CTF then is inertia and measured as inertia (not gravitational) mass. The thing that forms the vortices is the gravitational mass objects - also real. That is, the CTF model already has an approach to electrodynamics.
Then in your paper, E_n = a_n exp[ i 2 pi N (t+ nR)] where N is the number of generating gravitational objects.
Here the new thing is a gravitational object rather than a charge object which the CTF needs if the vortices are gravitational objects.
Hodge

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20180301/600f4d5a/attachment.html>