[General] Space as a CTF

Adam K afokay at gmail.com
Wed Feb 28 16:22:46 PST 2018


Chandra,

I agree with you about charge being emergent. I can visualize it! But I
cannot yet explain my vision. Hopefully this situation will not drag on for
another 1.5 years as it has done.

Adam

On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 4:06 PM, Roychoudhuri, Chandra <
chandra.roychoudhuri at uconn.edu> wrote:

> Very interesting thoughts, John!
>
> Keep it up and move forward.
>
> Remember, I postulate that all the forces are different kinds of potential
> gradients  (“curvatures”) around the self-looped *field-particles* in the
> CTF. Of course, I have borrowed the concept from Einstein’s “gravity is a
> curvature of space” and have generalized it to get rid of “exchange
> particles for different forces”.
>
>
>
> Mathematically structuring the self-looped, in-phase doughnuts (Torus?)
> will be a critical step forward.
>
> I also intuitively believe that charge is an emergent property out of the
> dynamics of the field-particles. But, I have not been able to visualize the
> exact structure that gives + and – discrete charges.
>
>
>
> Chandra.
>
>
>
> *From:* General [mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.
> edu at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org] *On Behalf Of *Hodge John
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 28, 2018 3:30 PM
> *To:* Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion <general at lists.
> natureoflightandparticles.org>
> *Subject:* [General] Space as a CTF
>
>
>
> Chandra
>
> I found myself revisiting your "Space as a complex Tension Field" paper.
>
> Perhaps the vortices are charge. Different vortices make + and - charge
> and the number of charges the intensity of the electric field. The CTF then
> is inertia and measured as inertia (not gravitational) mass. The thing that
> forms the vortices is the gravitational mass objects - also real. That is,
> the CTF model already has an approach to electrodynamics.
>
> Then in your paper, E_n = a_n exp[ i 2 pi N (t+ nR)] where N is the number
> of generating gravitational objects.
>
> Here the new thing is a gravitational object rather than a charge object
> which the CTF needs if the vortices are gravitational objects.
>
> Hodge
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light
> and Particles General Discussion List at afokay at gmail.com
> <a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-
> natureoflightandparticles.org/afokay%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
> Click here to unsubscribe
> </a>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20180228/499221e1/attachment.html>


More information about the General mailing list