[General] Space as a CTF

Hodge John jchodge at frontier.com
Wed Feb 28 18:54:48 PST 2018


ChandraThanks.I'm considering that charge is vortices in my plenum (field). The hods (gravitational mass) produce vortices as they move.I had noted Your CTF is similar to my \rho.I'm relieved that I won't be stepping on your toes.Hodge 

    On Wednesday, February 28, 2018 7:23 PM, Adam K <afokay at gmail.com> wrote:
 

 Chandra,
I agree with you about charge being emergent. I can visualize it! But I cannot yet explain my vision. Hopefully this situation will not drag on for another 1.5 years as it has done.
Adam 
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 4:06 PM, Roychoudhuri, Chandra <chandra.roychoudhuri at uconn.edu> wrote:

Very interesting thoughts, John!Keep it up and move forward.Remember, I postulate that all the forces are different kinds of potential gradients  (“curvatures”) around the self-loopedfield-particles in the CTF. Of course, I have borrowed the concept from Einstein’s “gravity is a curvature of space” and have generalized it to get rid of “exchange particles for different forces”. Mathematically structuring the self-looped, in-phase doughnuts (Torus?) will be a critical step forward.I also intuitively believe that charge is an emergent property out of the dynamics of the field-particles. But, I have not been able to visualize the exact structure that gives + and – discrete charges.  Chandra. From: General [mailto:general-bounces+ chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn. edu at lists. natureoflightandparticles.org]On Behalf Of Hodge John
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2018 3:30 PM
To: Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion <general at lists. natureoflightandparticles.org>
Subject: [General] Space as a CTF ChandraI found myself revisiting your "Space as a complex Tension Field" paper.Perhaps the vortices are charge. Different vortices make + and - charge and the number of charges the intensity of the electric field. The CTF then is inertia and measured as inertia (not gravitational) mass. The thing that forms the vortices is the gravitational mass objects - also real. That is, the CTF model already has an approach to electrodynamics.Then in your paper, E_n = a_n exp[ i 2 pi N (t+ nR)] where N is the number of generating gravitational objects.Here the new thing is a gravitational object rather than a charge object which the CTF needs if the vortices are gravitational objects.Hodge 
______________________________ _________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at afokay at gmail.com
<a href="http://lists. natureoflightandparticles.org/ options.cgi/general- natureoflightandparticles.org/ afokay%40gmail.com?unsub=1& unsubconfirm=1">
Click here to unsubscribe
</a>



_______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at jchodge at frontier.com
<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/jchodge%40frontier.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
Click here to unsubscribe
</a>


   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20180301/a4192399/attachment.html>


More information about the General mailing list