[General] CLASSICAL,QUANTUM MECHANICS
Wolfgang Baer
wolf at nascentinc.com
Sun May 6 10:56:11 PDT 2018
Andre:
your paper "The Hydrogen Atom Fundamental Resonance States" available at
the site below is indeed a great work of interest. After a very brief
review let me ask is I have this right
You are claiming the quantum jumps can be calculated as continuous
electromagnetic interactions
That "electromagnetic bremsstrahlung photons could be defined as
self-sustaining their own motion in a localized manner without the need
for any underlying ether, from the simple interaction of their own
internal mutually inducing E and B fields"End section 1.
By "localized manner" Does this mean a self contained E, B field that
imposes its own boundary conditions?
When you say without "ether" does this mean without space ? Or are the
fields still conceived as propagating in some space.
WOlf
Dr. ;
Wolfgang Baer
Research Director
Nascent Systems Inc.
tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
E-mail wolf at NascentInc.com
On 5/6/2018 1:52 AM, Andrew Meulenberg wrote:
> Dear Andre,
>
> Thank you for providing the link to your paper. I'm only 1/10 the way
> thru it and have already found 1/2 dozen points (with references) that
> are important bases to my views of physics. It is nice to know that
> some of them have historical precedent. I have 2 papers, which I need
> to publish, that can use yours as a reference.
>
> Andrew M.
> _ _ _
>
> On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 11:53 PM, André Michaud <srp2 at srpinc.org
> <mailto:srp2 at srpinc.org>> wrote:
>
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> To your first question,
>
> From equation (5-22) and afferent text, page 132 in reference
> "Quantum Physics of Atoms, Molecules, Solids, Nuclei, and
> Particles - Second edition", by R. Eisberg and R.Resnick,
> Schrödinger's equation had an imaginary part from the get go.
>
> Initially, Schrödinger meant the wave function to represent a
> resonance volume within which the localized electron remained
> captive when in bound state:
>
> http://file.scirp.org/Html/17-7503469_84158.htm
> <http://file.scirp.org/Html/17-7503469_84158.htm>
>
> Best Regards
>
> André
>
> ---
> André Michaud
> GSJournal admin
> http://www.gsjournal.net/
> https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2740-5684
> <https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2740-5684>
> http://www.srpinc.org/
>
>
>
> On Sat, 5 May 2018 19:25:17 -0700, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
>
> Two questions:
>
> 1) Nina Sotina's paper in The Vigier 10 proceedings points out
> something that has puzzled me for a long time. Schroedinger's 1926
> paper introducing the Wave function was a real classic function
> not an imaginary. In october 1926 Von Madelung derived a classic
> hydrodynamic formulation of quantum theory but did so from the
> Schroedinger equation with an imaginary wave function. Both
> Schroedinger's and Madelung's derivation suggests they thought QM
> waves were real, an interpretation, which I tend to favor.
>
> Were and who introduced the imaginary?
>
> 2) Along those lines I just ran into
>
> THE GRAND UNIFIED THEORY OF CLASSICAL QUANTUM MECHANICS by Dr.
> Randell Mills
>
> The guy knows a lot of physics and claims he can explain the
> results of quantum theory from purely classical physics.
>
> His claim that the electron is a charge shell rather than a
> probability is similar to my CAT theory, only my rational is to
>
> analyze quantum theory as a mental projection of the observer i.e.
> as the physics of the observer.
>
> Is this guy a bullshitter? Anyone heard of him?
>
> http://brilliantlightpower.com/theory-overview/
> <http://brilliantlightpower.com/theory-overview/>
>
> Theory Overview:
>
> The claim that classic physics “ only the simple laws of Newton’s
> Mechanics, Maxwell’s equations of electricity, magnetism, and
> electrodynamics, and the fundamental constants of nature” are
> adequate to explain “All observables from quarks to cosmos … in
> closed-form analytical expressions containing fundamental
> constants only.”
>
> “According to Mills GUT-CP, nature is classical. Electrons, when
> bound in an atom, are considered to be discrete two-dimensional
> spherical membranes of charge and current that completely surround
> the nucleus as a bubble.”
>
> “Mills GUT-CP is a /confirmable/ theory, … Data sets include the
> electron spin, g-factor, ionization energies of 1-20 electron
> atoms and ions (400 states); the state lifetimes and line
> intensities of hydrogen; the excited states of helium; the excited
> states of H2, the relationships between the masses of fundamental
> particles; the bond distances, energies, angles, and dipole
> moments of over 800 molecules; and the parameters of a variety of
> extended solids. From the molecular theory, Brilliant Light Power
> has launched a molecular modeling subsidiary, Millsian Inc
> <http://www.millsian.com/>.
>
> “ The essence of GUTCP is that every solution is for the true or
> real source of the observable wherein any solution of an
> observable as the inherent information for all observables that
> can be related to that observable.”
>
> *Here is a a site to down load his book*
>
> *http://brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/theory/GUT-CP-2016-Ed-Book-Web-121517.pdf
> <http://brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/theory/GUT-CP-2016-Ed-Book-Web-121517.pdf>*
>
> --
> Wolfgang Baer
> Nascent Systems Inc.
> 380W. Carmel Valley Rd.
> Carmel Valley, CA 93924 USA
> Wolf at NascentInc.com <mailto:Support at NascentInc.com>
>
> _______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of
> Light and Particles General Discussion List at srp2 at srpinc.org
> <mailto:srp2 at srpinc.org>
>
> Click here to unsubscribe
> <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/srp2%40srpinc.org?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of
> Light and Particles General Discussion List at mules333 at gmail.com
> <mailto:mules333 at gmail.com>
> <a
> href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/mules333%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1
> <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/mules333%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1>">
> Click here to unsubscribe
> </a>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20180506/6c5f3311/attachment.html>
More information about the General
mailing list