[General] General Digest, Vol 40, Issue 3
Wolfgang Baer
wolf at nascentinc.com
Sat May 12 15:46:41 PDT 2018
Eric
I attended a conference and heard a lecture on nanowires from a guy at
Stanford in which he claimed to have demonstrated the enlargement of the
antenna cross-section that loked exactly like a resonance antenna near
field effect. Unfortunately he has not returned E-mails so I have not
been able to folloe the lead.
Glad you are still in the loop
WOlf
Dr. Wolfgang Baer
Research Director
Nascent Systems Inc.
tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
E-mail wolf at NascentInc.com
On 5/12/2018 3:21 PM, André Michaud wrote:
>
> Dear Eric,
>
> Thank you so much for sharing this link to your interesting research
> website. I saved the link for further study of your work on resonance
> antenae.
>
> Best Regards
>
> André
>
> ---
> André Michaud
> GSJournal admin
> http://www.gsjournal.net/
> https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2740-5684
> http://www.srpinc.org/
>
>
>
> On Sat, 12 May 2018 07:26:43 +0000 (UTC), Eric Reiter wrote:
>
> On resonance antennae. I mention in my papers how it allows the
> accumulation hypothesis to work, along with a calculating a loading
> time to include a pre loaded state. Bill Beaty at his amasci website
> also covers this. It makes it reasonable for the photoelectric effect
> to work without photons. See my thresholdmodel.com website. It is, an
> old idea
> Eric
> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>
> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 1:02 PM,
> general-request at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org
> <general-request at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org> wrote:
> Send General mailing list submissions to
> general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org
> <mailto:general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/listinfo.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> general-request at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org
> <mailto:general-request at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> general-owner at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org
> <mailto:general-owner at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of General digest..."
> Today's Topics:
> 1. Re: CLASSICAL,QUANTUM MECHANICS (Andr? Michaud)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 16:19:28 -0400
> From: Andr? Michaud <srp2 at srpinc.org <mailto:srp2 at srpinc.org>>
> To: general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org
> <mailto:general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
> Cc: wolf at nascentinc.com <mailto:wolf at nascentinc.com>,
> srp2 at srpinc.org <mailto:srp2 at srpinc.org>
> Subject: Re: [General] CLASSICAL,QUANTUM MECHANICS
> Message-ID:
> <201805092019.w49KJSug031121 at mail142c0.megamailservers.com
> <mailto:201805092019.w49KJSug031121 at mail142c0.megamailservers.com>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> Hi Wolfgang,
> Thank you so much for the offer. I never heard of resonance antennas.
> I am definitely interested. I am a beginner in resonance
> transmission. All pertaining refs will be welcome.
> I am planning to completely refresh in all aspects of harmonic
> oscillation resonance for the coming months, time allowing, to
> establish a fresh start before attempting to tackle what remains
> to be addressed, that is resonance transitions between
> stable/metastable states (emission and absorption).
> I became aware of the exact direction that remained to be
> clarified only as I was writing my last paper, so I never looked
> closely at this before.
> I really need to study the basics in depth. For now, I just want
> to let all these new maths (for me) soak in and seamlessly merge
> with the rest to eventually be able to follow new trails. I am in
> no hurry with this, now that the trail is clear.
> Quite possible that others already up to speed might get there
> first, which would be fine with me.
> Best Regards
> Andr?
> ---
> Andr? Michaud
> GSJournal admin
> http://www.gsjournal.net/
> https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2740-5684
> http://www.srpinc.org/
> On Wed, 9 May 2018 12:13:33 -0700, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
> Andre:
> Have you heard of resonance antennas . These are dynamic
> antennas that expand the effective antenna size so it can capture
> energy from a much larger crossection. It is a near field
> phenomena discovered and used in small transistor radios, and nano
> wires
> If it had been known in the 1900 we would probably not have
> invented photons.
> Let me know if interested and I can dig up some references
> WOlf
> Dr. Wolfgang Baer
> Research Director
> Nascent Systems Inc.
> tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
> E-mail wolf at NascentInc.com <mailto:wolf at NascentInc.com>
> On 5/6/2018 12:43 PM, Andr? Michaud wrote:
>
> Dear Wolfgang,
> Thank you for your appreciation.
> I'll answer inline for consistency.
> Best Regards
> ---
> Andr? Michaud
> GSJournal admin
> http://www.gsjournal.net/
> https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2740-5684
> http://www.srpinc.org/
> On Sun, 6 May 2018 10:56:11 -0700, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
> Andre:
> your paper "The Hydrogen Atom Fundamental Resonance States"
> available at the site below is indeed a great work of interest.
> After a very brief review let me ask is I have this right
> You are claiming the quantum jumps can be calculated as continuous
> electromagnetic interactions
>
> This is what Schr?dinger was planning to promote by introducing
> the wave function, in agreement with de Broglie.
> I also am convinced that transitions between stationary states are
> continuously progressive resonance processes. Energy transfer via
> resonance processes are known to happen and have been mathematized
> (F?rster resonance transfers for example).
> If electrons really are in resonance states as de Broglie
> concluded, It think that there is no inconsistency with
> considering that bremmsstrahlung electromagnetic photons could be
> emitted by means of such progressive processes, and that the
> transitions between stable/metastable states could be directly
> linked via such emission.
> Actually, if nobody tackles this issue before I become
> knowledgeable enough to do it myself, this is exactly where I am
> eventually headed.
>
> That "electromagnetic bremsstrahlung photons could be defined as
> self-sustaining their own motion in a localized manner without the
> need for any underlying ether, from the simple interaction of
> their own internal mutually inducing E and B fields"End section 1.
> If electromagnetic bremmsstrahlung photons are emitted via such
> progressive continuous mechanical processes, given that the
> Kaufman experiment and the relation that Marmet discovered
> between the relativistic mass increment and the energy of the
> electron magnetic field, then such bremmsstrahlung photons can
> only be electromagnetic in nature by definition. If they have a
> such an intrinsic magnetic field, then they also have a matching
> intrinsic electric field. To be consistent with Maxwell, they have
> to mutually induce each other, which means that they are of
> default equal density by structure.
> This very structure, from considerations drawn from the work of
> Kaurman and Marmet mandates that half their total complement of
> energy be its momentum energy propelling the other electromagnetic
> half that oscillates electromagnetically transversally (to be
> consistent with Maxwell).
>
> By "localized manner" Does this mean a self contained E, B field
> that imposes its own boundary conditions?
> Actually, the E and B fields are "mathematical representations" of
> the intensity/density of the "really physically existing energy"
> of which the physically existing bremmsstrahlung photon is made
> that we use to "measure" the really existing energy. It has to be
> the actual "physically existing energy" that oscillates in a
> self-sustaining manner. The E and B fields are only mathematical
> representations that allow us to think about this energy and to
> calculate it.
> When you say without "ether" does this mean without space ? Or are
> the fields still conceived as propagating in some space.
>
> The Ether was conceived of as an underlying substance that would
> be the "material" that would materially oscillate and transmit
> Maxwell's EM waves as he conceived them. But if electromagnetic
> bremmsstrahlung photons self-sustain their own motion, there is no
> need any more for the very concept of "ether".
> Of course these photons would still propagate in vacuum, but don't
> need any underlying "ether" to transmit them. They auto-propel at
> the default equilibrium speed of light in empty vacuum, so to speak.
> Space, vacuum, to me is only the empty vacuum in which all that we
> can observe exists, whatever it might be.
> Andr?
> WOlf
> Dr. ;
> Wolfgang Baer
> Research Director
> Nascent Systems Inc.
> tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
> E-mail wolf at NascentInc.com <mailto:wolf at NascentInc.com>
> On 5/6/2018 1:52 AM, Andrew Meulenberg wrote:
> Dear Andre,
>
> Thank you for providing the link to your paper. I'm only 1/10 the
> way thru it and have already found 1/2 dozen points (with
> references) that are important bases to my views of physics. It is
> nice to know that some of them have historical precedent. I have 2
> papers, which I need to publish, that can use yours as a reference.
>
> Andrew M.
> _ _ _
>
> On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 11:53 PM, Andr? Michaud <srp2 at srpinc.org
> <mailto:srp2 at srpinc.org>> wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang,
> To your first question,
> >From equation (5-22) and afferent text, page 132 in reference
> "Quantum Physics of Atoms, Molecules, Solids, Nuclei, and
> Particles - Second edition", by R. Eisberg and R.Resnick,
> Schr?dinger's equation had an imaginary part from the get go.
> Initially, Schr?dinger meant the wave function to represent a
> resonance volume within which the localized electron remained
> captive when in bound state:
> http://file.scirp.org/Html/17-7503469_84158.htm
> Best Regards
> Andr?
> ---
> Andr? Michaud
> GSJournal admin
> http://www.gsjournal.net/
> https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2740-5684
> http://www.srpinc.org/
> On Sat, 5 May 2018 19:25:17 -0700, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
>
> Two questions:
> 1) Nina Sotina's paper in The Vigier 10 proceedings points out
> something that has puzzled me for a long time. Schroedinger's 1926
> paper introducing the Wave function was a real classic function
> not an imaginary. In october 1926 Von Madelung derived a classic
> hydrodynamic formulation of quantum theory but did so from the
> Schroedinger equation with an imaginary wave function. Both
> Schroedinger's and Madelung's derivation suggests they thought QM
> waves were real, an interpretation, which I tend to favor.
> Were and who introduced the imaginary?
> 2) Along those lines I just ran into
> THE GRAND UNIFIED THEORY OF CLASSICAL QUANTUM MECHANICS by Dr.
> Randell Mills
> The guy knows a lot of physics and claims he can explain the
> results of quantum theory from purely classical physics.
> His claim that the electron is a charge shell rather than a
> probability is similar to my CAT theory, only my rational is to
> analyze quantum theory as a mental projection of the observer i.e.
> as the physics of the observer.
> Is this guy a bullshitter? Anyone heard of him?
> http://brilliantlightpower.com/theory-overview/
> Theory Overview:
> The claim that classic physics ? only the simple laws of Newton?s
> Mechanics, Maxwell?s equations of electricity, magnetism, and
> electrodynamics, and the fundamental constants of nature? are
> adequate to explain ?All observables from quarks to cosmos ? in
> closed-form analytical expressions containing fundamental
> constants only.?
> ?According to Mills GUT-CP, nature is classical. Electrons, when
> bound in an atom, are considered to be discrete two-dimensional
> spherical membranes of charge and current that completely surround
> the nucleus as a bubble.?
> ?Mills GUT-CP is a confirmable theory, ? Data sets include the
> electron spin, g-factor, ionization energies of 1-20 electron
> atoms and ions (400 states); the state lifetimes and line
> intensities of hydrogen; the excited states of helium; the excited
> states of H2, the relationships between the masses of fundamental
> particles; the bond distances, energies, angles, and dipole
> moments of over 800 molecules; and the parameters of a variety of
> extended solids. From the molecular theory, Brilliant Light Power
> has launched a molecular modeling subsidiary, Millsian Inc.
> ? The essence of GUTCP is that every solution is for the true or
> real source of the observable wherein any solution of an
> observable as the inherent information for all observables that
> can be related to that observable.?
>
> Here is a a site to down load his book
>
> http://brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/theory/GUT-CP-2016-Ed-Book-Web-121517.pdf
> --
> Wolfgang Baer
> Nascent Systems Inc.
> 380W. Carmel Valley Rd.
> Carmel Valley, CA 93924 USA
> Wolf at NascentInc.com <mailto:Wolf at NascentInc.com>
> _______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of
> Light and Particles General Discussion List at srp2 at srpinc.org
> <mailto:srp2 at srpinc.org>
> Click here to unsubscribe
> _______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of
> Light and Particles General Discussion List at mules333 at gmail.com
> <mailto:mules333 at gmail.com>
> <a
> href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/mules333%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
> Click here to unsubscribe
> </a>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20180509/3e977b66/attachment-0001.html>
> ------------------------------
> Subject: Digest Footer
> _______________________________________________
> If you would like to change your settings for the Nature of Light
> and Particles General Discussion List, please visit
> http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/
> <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/%20>listinfo/general-natureoflightandparticles.org
> ------------------------------
> End of General Digest, Vol 40, Issue 3
> **************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of
> Light and Particles General Discussion List at srp2 at srpinc.org
>
> Click here to unsubscribe
> <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/srp2%40srpinc.org?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at Wolf at nascentinc.com
> <a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
> Click here to unsubscribe
> </a>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20180512/db90a4d0/attachment.html>
More information about the General
mailing list