[General] General Digest, Vol 40, Issue 3

Wolfgang Baer wolf at nascentinc.com
Sat May 12 15:46:41 PDT 2018


Eric

I attended a conference and heard a lecture on nanowires from a guy at 
Stanford in which he claimed to have demonstrated the enlargement of the 
antenna cross-section that loked exactly like a resonance antenna near 
field effect. Unfortunately he has not returned E-mails so I have not 
been able to folloe the lead.

Glad you are still in the loop

WOlf

Dr. Wolfgang Baer
Research Director
Nascent Systems Inc.
tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
E-mail wolf at NascentInc.com

On 5/12/2018 3:21 PM, André Michaud wrote:
>
> Dear Eric,
>
> Thank you so much for sharing this link to your interesting research 
> website. I saved the link for further study of your work on resonance 
> antenae.
>
> Best Regards
>
> André
>
> ---
> André Michaud
> GSJournal admin
> http://www.gsjournal.net/
> https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2740-5684
> http://www.srpinc.org/
>
>
>
> On Sat, 12 May 2018 07:26:43 +0000 (UTC), Eric Reiter wrote:
>
> On resonance antennae. I mention in my papers how it allows the 
> accumulation hypothesis to work, along with a calculating a loading 
> time to include a pre loaded state.  Bill Beaty at his amasci website 
> also covers this. It makes it reasonable for the photoelectric effect 
> to work without photons.  See my thresholdmodel.com website. It is, an 
> old idea
> Eric
> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android 
> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>
>     On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 1:02 PM,
>     general-request at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org
>     <general-request at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org> wrote:
>     Send General mailing list submissions to
>     general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org
>     <mailto:general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
>     To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>     http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/listinfo.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org
>     or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>     general-request at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org
>     <mailto:general-request at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
>     You can reach the person managing the list at
>     general-owner at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org
>     <mailto:general-owner at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
>     When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>     than "Re: Contents of General digest..."
>     Today's Topics:
>       1. Re: CLASSICAL,QUANTUM MECHANICS (Andr? Michaud)
>     ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>     Message: 1
>     Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 16:19:28 -0400
>     From: Andr? Michaud <srp2 at srpinc.org <mailto:srp2 at srpinc.org>>
>     To: general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org
>     <mailto:general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
>     Cc: wolf at nascentinc.com <mailto:wolf at nascentinc.com>,
>     srp2 at srpinc.org <mailto:srp2 at srpinc.org>
>     Subject: Re: [General] CLASSICAL,QUANTUM MECHANICS
>     Message-ID:
>         <201805092019.w49KJSug031121 at mail142c0.megamailservers.com
>     <mailto:201805092019.w49KJSug031121 at mail142c0.megamailservers.com>>
>     Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>     Hi Wolfgang,
>     Thank you so much for the offer. I never heard of resonance antennas.
>     I am definitely interested. I am a beginner in resonance
>     transmission. All pertaining refs will be welcome.
>     I am planning to completely refresh in all aspects of harmonic
>     oscillation resonance for the coming months, time allowing, to
>     establish a fresh start before attempting to tackle what remains
>     to be addressed, that is resonance transitions between
>     stable/metastable states (emission and absorption).
>     I became aware of the exact direction that remained to be
>     clarified only as I was writing my last paper, so I never looked
>     closely at this before.
>     I really need to study the basics in depth. For now, I just want
>     to let all these new maths (for me) soak in and seamlessly merge
>     with the rest to eventually be able to follow new trails. I am in
>     no hurry with this, now that the trail is clear.
>     Quite possible that others already up to speed might get there
>     first, which would be fine with me.
>     Best Regards
>     Andr?
>     ---
>     Andr? Michaud
>     GSJournal admin
>     http://www.gsjournal.net/
>     https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2740-5684
>     http://www.srpinc.org/
>     On Wed, 9 May 2018 12:13:33 -0700, Wolfgang Baer  wrote:
>     Andre:
>     Have you heard of resonance  antennas . These are dynamic
>     antennas that expand the effective antenna size so it can capture
>     energy from a much larger crossection. It is a near field
>     phenomena discovered and used in small transistor radios, and nano
>     wires
>     If it had been known in the 1900 we would probably not have
>     invented photons.
>     Let me know if interested and I can dig up some references
>     WOlf
>     Dr. Wolfgang Baer
>     Research Director
>     Nascent Systems Inc.
>     tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
>     E-mail wolf at NascentInc.com <mailto:wolf at NascentInc.com>
>     On 5/6/2018 12:43 PM, Andr? Michaud wrote:
>      
>     Dear Wolfgang,
>     Thank you for your appreciation.
>     I'll answer inline for consistency.
>     Best Regards
>     ---
>     Andr? Michaud
>     GSJournal admin
>     http://www.gsjournal.net/
>     https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2740-5684
>     http://www.srpinc.org/
>     On Sun, 6 May 2018 10:56:11 -0700, Wolfgang Baer  wrote:
>     Andre:
>     your paper "The Hydrogen Atom Fundamental Resonance States"
>     available at the site below is indeed a great work of interest.
>     After a very brief review let me ask is I have this right
>     You are claiming the quantum jumps can be calculated as continuous
>     electromagnetic interactions
>      
>     This is what Schr?dinger was planning to promote by introducing
>     the wave function, in agreement with de Broglie.
>     I also am convinced that transitions between stationary states are
>     continuously progressive resonance processes. Energy transfer via
>     resonance processes are known to happen and have been mathematized
>     (F?rster resonance transfers for example).
>     If electrons really are in resonance states as de Broglie
>     concluded, It think that there is no inconsistency with
>     considering that bremmsstrahlung electromagnetic photons could be
>     emitted by means of such progressive processes, and that the
>     transitions between stable/metastable states could be directly
>     linked via such emission.
>     Actually, if nobody tackles this issue before I become
>     knowledgeable enough to do it myself, this is exactly where I am
>     eventually headed.
>      
>     That "electromagnetic bremsstrahlung photons could be defined as
>     self-sustaining their own motion in a localized manner without the
>     need for any underlying ether, from the simple interaction of
>     their own internal mutually inducing E and B fields"End section 1.
>     If electromagnetic bremmsstrahlung photons are emitted via such
>     progressive continuous mechanical processes, given that the
>     Kaufman experiment and the relation that  Marmet discovered
>     between the relativistic mass increment and the energy of the
>     electron magnetic field, then such bremmsstrahlung photons can
>     only be electromagnetic in nature by definition. If they have a
>     such an intrinsic magnetic field, then they also have a matching
>     intrinsic electric field. To be consistent with Maxwell, they have
>     to mutually induce each other, which means that they are of
>     default equal density by structure.
>     This very structure, from considerations drawn from the work of
>     Kaurman and Marmet mandates that half their total complement of
>     energy be its momentum energy propelling the other electromagnetic
>     half that oscillates electromagnetically transversally (to be
>     consistent with Maxwell).
>      
>     By "localized manner" Does this mean a self contained E, B field
>     that imposes its own boundary conditions?
>     Actually, the E and B fields are "mathematical representations" of
>     the intensity/density of the "really physically existing energy"
>     of which the physically existing bremmsstrahlung photon is made
>     that we use to "measure" the really existing energy. It has to be
>     the actual "physically existing energy" that oscillates in a
>     self-sustaining manner. The E and B fields are only mathematical
>     representations that allow us to think about this energy and to
>     calculate it.
>     When you say without "ether" does this mean without space ? Or are
>     the fields still conceived as propagating in some space.
>      
>     The Ether was conceived of as an underlying substance that would
>     be the "material" that would materially oscillate and transmit
>     Maxwell's EM waves as he conceived them. But if electromagnetic
>     bremmsstrahlung photons self-sustain their own motion, there is no
>     need any more for the very concept of "ether".
>     Of course these photons would still propagate in vacuum, but don't
>     need any underlying "ether" to transmit them. They auto-propel at
>     the default equilibrium speed of light in empty vacuum, so to speak.
>     Space, vacuum, to me is only the empty vacuum in which all that we
>     can observe exists, whatever it might be.  
>     Andr?
>     WOlf
>     Dr. ;
>     Wolfgang Baer
>     Research Director
>     Nascent Systems Inc.
>     tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
>     E-mail wolf at NascentInc.com <mailto:wolf at NascentInc.com>
>     On 5/6/2018 1:52 AM, Andrew Meulenberg wrote:
>     Dear Andre,
>      
>     Thank you for providing the link to your paper. I'm only 1/10 the
>     way thru it and have already found 1/2 dozen points (with
>     references) that are important bases to my views of physics. It is
>     nice to know that some of them have historical precedent. I have 2
>     papers, which I need to publish, that can use yours as a reference.
>      
>     Andrew M.
>     _ _ _
>      
>     On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 11:53 PM, Andr? Michaud <srp2 at srpinc.org
>     <mailto:srp2 at srpinc.org>> wrote:
>     Hi Wolfgang,
>     To your first question,
>     >From equation (5-22) and afferent text, page 132 in reference
>     "Quantum Physics of Atoms, Molecules, Solids, Nuclei, and
>     Particles - Second edition", by R. Eisberg and R.Resnick,
>     Schr?dinger's equation had an imaginary part from the get go.
>     Initially, Schr?dinger meant the wave function to represent a
>     resonance volume within which the localized electron remained
>     captive when in bound state:
>     http://file.scirp.org/Html/17-7503469_84158.htm
>     Best Regards
>     Andr?
>     ---
>     Andr? Michaud
>     GSJournal admin
>     http://www.gsjournal.net/
>     https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2740-5684
>     http://www.srpinc.org/
>     On Sat, 5 May 2018 19:25:17 -0700, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
>      
>     Two questions:
>     1) Nina Sotina's paper in The Vigier 10 proceedings points out
>     something that has puzzled me for a long time. Schroedinger's 1926
>     paper introducing the Wave function was a real classic function
>     not an imaginary. In october 1926 Von Madelung derived a classic
>     hydrodynamic formulation of quantum theory but did so from the
>     Schroedinger equation with an imaginary wave function. Both
>     Schroedinger's and Madelung's derivation suggests they thought QM
>     waves were real, an interpretation, which I tend to favor.
>     Were and who introduced the imaginary?
>     2) Along those lines I just ran into
>     THE GRAND UNIFIED THEORY OF CLASSICAL QUANTUM MECHANICS by Dr.
>     Randell Mills
>     The guy knows a lot of physics and claims he can explain the
>     results of quantum theory from purely classical physics.
>     His claim that the electron is a charge shell rather than a
>     probability is similar to my CAT theory, only my rational is to
>     analyze quantum theory as a mental projection of the observer i.e.
>     as the physics of the observer.
>     Is this guy a bullshitter? Anyone heard of him?
>     http://brilliantlightpower.com/theory-overview/
>     Theory Overview:
>     The claim that classic physics ? only the simple laws of Newton?s
>     Mechanics, Maxwell?s equations of electricity, magnetism, and
>     electrodynamics, and the fundamental constants of nature? are
>     adequate to explain ?All observables from quarks to cosmos ? in
>     closed-form analytical expressions containing fundamental
>     constants only.?
>     ?According to Mills GUT-CP, nature is classical. Electrons, when
>     bound in an atom, are considered to be discrete two-dimensional
>     spherical membranes of charge and current that completely surround
>     the nucleus as a bubble.?
>     ?Mills GUT-CP is a confirmable theory, ? Data sets include the
>     electron spin, g-factor, ionization energies of 1-20 electron
>     atoms and ions (400 states); the state lifetimes and line
>     intensities of hydrogen; the excited states of helium; the excited
>     states of H2, the relationships between the masses of fundamental
>     particles; the bond distances, energies, angles, and dipole
>     moments of over 800 molecules; and the parameters of a variety of
>     extended solids. From the molecular theory, Brilliant Light Power
>     has launched a molecular modeling subsidiary, Millsian Inc.
>     ? The essence of GUTCP is that every solution is for the true or
>     real source of the observable wherein any solution of an
>     observable as the inherent information for all observables that
>     can be related to that observable.?
>      
>     Here is a a site to down load his book
>      
>     http://brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/theory/GUT-CP-2016-Ed-Book-Web-121517.pdf
>     --
>     Wolfgang Baer
>     Nascent Systems Inc.
>     380W. Carmel Valley Rd.
>     Carmel Valley, CA 93924 USA
>     Wolf at NascentInc.com <mailto:Wolf at NascentInc.com>
>     _______________________________________________
>     If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of
>     Light and Particles General Discussion List at srp2 at srpinc.org
>     <mailto:srp2 at srpinc.org>
>     Click here to unsubscribe
>     _______________________________________________
>     If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of
>     Light and Particles General Discussion List at mules333 at gmail.com
>     <mailto:mules333 at gmail.com>
>     <a
>     href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/mules333%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
>     Click here to unsubscribe
>     </a>
>      
>     -------------- next part --------------
>     An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>     URL:
>     <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20180509/3e977b66/attachment-0001.html>
>     ------------------------------
>     Subject: Digest Footer
>     _______________________________________________
>     If you would like to change your settings for the Nature of Light
>     and Particles General Discussion List, please visit
>     http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/
>     <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/%20>listinfo/general-natureoflightandparticles.org
>     ------------------------------
>     End of General Digest, Vol 40, Issue 3
>     **************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of 
> Light and Particles General Discussion List at srp2 at srpinc.org
>
> Click here to unsubscribe 
> <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/srp2%40srpinc.org?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at Wolf at nascentinc.com
> <a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
> Click here to unsubscribe
> </a>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20180512/db90a4d0/attachment.html>


More information about the General mailing list