[General] Impact of knowing our true nature

[Albrecht Giese]

Hi Wolf,

I also feel that this is an appropriate description of reality. My 
teachers at school, my professors at the university, and the leading 
scientists in our cultural region seem to me all programmed in the way 
described by Dilbert.

A specific indication of this behaviour is the fact that the question of 
an ether in relativity is treated as a /taboo/. The well known theorist 
Franco Selleri, who was also a member of our London PIRT community, has 
tried during about two decades to initiate a discussion about ether. He 
did not find anybody of main stream who was willing to talk to him. And 
regarding this topic, I am reading the excellent book of Ludwik Kostro 
about Einstein and the ether. The arguments of Einstein presented there 
are partly related to antiquated physics, partly did Einstein not react 
to arguments. In a discussion with Hendrik A. Lorentz about necessity of 
an ether for rotation he presented as his own example that the Foucault 
pendulum cannot be explained without an ether. But then he said that he  
could nevertheless not accept an ether because it were in conflict with 
one of his principles. Einstein was even stronger with this. In 1926, in 
the context of some faked experiments, he said to his friend Max von 
Laue: Experiments are not important for me because my theory is so well 
considered and so perfect that experiments are not relevant.

Isn't this a scientific attitude? And on this basis we are not allowed 
to discuss e.g. the question of ether.
Albrecht


Am 11.03.2019 um 04:07 schrieb Roychoudhuri, Chandra:
> Excellent one, Wolfgang!!😄
> Chandra.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Mar 10, 2019, at 10:31 PM, Wolfgang Baer <wolf at nascentinc.com 
> <mailto:wolf at nascentinc.com>> wrote:
>
>> To all:
>>
>>
>> Last week this Dilbert cartoon appeared in the Sunday paper. Since my 
>> corrent work is precisely an attempt to develop a Conscious Action 
>> Theory that includes our true nature ofus sentient beings, and in 
>> doing so discivered I had to go back to the physics of the pre 1900 
>> time frame and start from the last time we had an intuitively 
>> undertandable theory I was amazed to read this in a popular media.
>>
>>
>>
>> 	<ojlligflbmcmiknf.jpg>
>>
>>
>> Makes you think doesn’t it?
>>
>> Wolf
>>
>> Dr. Wolfgang Baer
>> Research Director
>> Nascent Systems Inc.
>> tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
>> E-mailwolf at NascentInc.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of 
>> Light and Particles General Discussion List at 
>> chandra.roychoudhuri at uconn.edu <mailto:chandra.roychoudhuri at uconn.edu>
>> <a 
>> href="https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.natureoflightandparticles.org%2Foptions.cgi%2Fgeneral-natureoflightandparticles.org%2Fchandra.roychoudhuri%2540uconn.edu%3Funsub%3D1%26unsubconfirm%3D1&data=02%7C01%7Cchandra.roychoudhuri%40uconn.edu 
>> <http://40uconn.edu>%7C6173b3d5b5c94856069608d6a5c9b7c7%7C17f1a87e2a254eaab9df9d439034b080%7C0%7C0%7C636878683129690291&sdata=PfZmTtgIYt0%2Fh%2FfyD6L9uaGVvwVCe5l0JVoaiEcBpNM%3D&reserved=0">
>> Click here to unsubscribe
>> </a>
>
> _______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at phys at a-giese.de
> <a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/phys%40a-giese.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
> Click here to unsubscribe
> </a>


---
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20190311/5f8a55cc/attachment.html>