[General] Impact of knowing our true nature

[Wolfgang Baer]

Yes I've read Selleri's book which contains, in my opinion, very valid 
and justified arguments why Einstein was wrong.

At one point when I worked on the early GPS system I tried to show 
people that the chip velocity and phase velocity of te EM waves sent for 
timation signals should show a measurable difference, even made a 
presentation at the National Bureau of Standards, but was politely ignored.

The Ionic layer delay would have made the measurement difficult anyway

wolf

Dr. Wolfgang Baer
Research Director
Nascent Systems Inc.
tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
E-mail wolf at NascentInc.com

On 3/11/2019 6:26 AM, Albrecht Giese wrote:
>
> Hi Wolf,
>
> I also feel that this is an appropriate description of reality. My 
> teachers at school, my professors at the university, and the leading 
> scientists in our cultural region seem to me all programmed in the way 
> described by Dilbert.
>
> A specific indication of this behaviour is the fact that the question 
> of an ether in relativity is treated as a /taboo/. The well known 
> theorist Franco Selleri, who was also a member of our London PIRT 
> community, has tried during about two decades to initiate a discussion 
> about ether. He did not find anybody of main stream who was willing to 
> talk to him. And regarding this topic, I am reading the excellent book 
> of Ludwik Kostro about Einstein and the ether. The arguments of 
> Einstein presented there are partly related to antiquated physics, 
> partly did Einstein not react to arguments. In a discussion with 
> Hendrik A. Lorentz about necessity of an ether for rotation he 
> presented as his own example that the Foucault pendulum cannot be 
> explained without an ether. But then he said that he  could 
> nevertheless not accept an ether because it were in conflict with one 
> of his principles. Einstein was even stronger with this. In 1926, in 
> the context of some faked experiments, he said to his friend Max von 
> Laue: Experiments are not important for me because my theory is so 
> well considered and so perfect that experiments are not relevant.
>
> Isn't this a scientific attitude? And on this basis we are not allowed 
> to discuss e.g. the question of ether.
> Albrecht
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20190311/1ac88c00/attachment.html>