[General] Lorentzian transformations without Einsteinian spacetime?

Tue Mar 19 16:39:22 PDT 2019

Hi DPR,

Great to see somebody asking the big questions!

The cyclic-photon understanding of elementary particles fully explains ALL 
of the findings and observations of Special Relativity - with NO exceptions.

For 'spacetime curvature' and associated concepts grouped under 'General 
Relativity', however, this alone doesn't do the trick.  One then needs to 
think a little further out of the box - or, as I see it, consider the wider 
implications of waveform-electromagnetic-field-formed particles of matter. 
This is the basis of a second paper I published in a peer-reviewed journal 
some years ago (the first dealt with SR, as you refer to below) - and it 
DOES neatly and fully deal with ALL those other issues.

The wider implications that I refer to are: electromagnetic fields don't 
have abrupt cutoffs - so our notion of localised particles of matter is an 
illusion caused by our senses (which are themselves mediated by EM field 
effects).  Physics tells us that electric and magnetic effects are unlimited 
in their range; yes, a Faraday Cage or solenoid will cut off gross field 
effects, but the Aharonov-Bohm effect shows that electromagnetic potential 
can't be blocked in this way.  It follows, then, that the time-varying EM 
fields of matter particles are likewise unlimited in extent - every particle 
is in effect infinite.

This is confirmed by the phenomenon of gravitation.  Forget 
action-at-a-distance and actuating particles (virtual photons etc - a useful 
concept but no more than that) - gravitation is the manifestation of the 
extended EM fields of matter particles.  Consider: our 
planet/solar-system/galaxy is being pulled, by gravity, towards The Great 
Attractor, a massive gravitational effect (hypermassive black hole?) 1/4 of 
a billion light years away.  Gravitation is 100% reciprocal - so every atom 
in your body is likewise attracting The Great Attractor, across unthinkable 
distances (!!!).

So how does this come about?  Simples.  Static electricity and magnetism are 
both 'artefacts' of that extended EM field.  Space is given a 'texture' by 
the summation at every point of the extended time-varying EM fields of every 
particle in the universe.  That texture provides the 'curvature' of 
spacetime, since photon-formed particles, and even light, are guided in 
their trajectories by that texture, or the 3D EM-variable landscape of 
space.

We're taught that forces of attraction & repulsion between opposite and like 
electrical charges respectively are equal in magnitude.  I've never seen any 
evidence or reasoning to support this and in fact the evidence contradicts 
it.  + and - charges in an 'uncharged' particle cancel each other out - but 
they're still there: even a neutron has + and - charges in its constituent 
quarks.  So those attraction and repulsion effects DON'T match; attraction 
is greater than repulsion - and we see the difference as 'gravitation', 
giving even 'neutral' particles an overall attractive effect.  The math 
works perfectly!

This also relates to a recent discussion in this group on 'propagation rate 
of gravitation': gravitation doesn't HAVE a rate of propagation - because it 
doesn't need to propagate, it's already there!  Hence 'instantaneous 
propagation'.

The evidence is all around us, if we bother to check it out and do the 
sums - it's not rocket science!  [Maybe that's the problem: many people 
prefer difficult solutions to easy ones...]

I'm attaching my two papers for your interest (Plus an overview you may find 
helpful).  You may also like to look at some of the non-technical 
presentations on my website:
http://transfinitemind.com/

Cheers,
Grahame

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "DataPacRat" <datapacrat at gmail.com>
To: "Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion" 
<general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2019 8:07 PM
Subject: [General] Lorentzian transformations without Einsteinian spacetime?

> Continuing to read through Akins' PDFs, I've come across an idea I'm
> hoping somebody here can help me understand better.
>
> If I understand this point right, if you assume that electrons are
> actually made of something photon-like, spinning round and round in
> their tiny circles, then as that electron is accelerated toward the
> speed of light, you can derive the Lorentz transformations of length
> and time from the angles of the spiralling photon-like-things.
>
> With this model, is there any reason to assume that spacetime itself
> is 'bent', ala the traditional explanation involving dropping a ball
> onto a sheet? That is, can this approach produce the precession of
> Mercury's orbit, and the other tests of relativity? Or am I misreading
> this, and this model is unrelated to this part of physics?
>
>
>
> Thank you for your time,
> --
> DataPacRat
> "Does aₘᵢₙ=2c²/Θ ? I don't know, but wouldn't it be fascinating if it 
> were?"
> _______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light 
> and Particles General Discussion List at grahame at starweave.com
> <a 
> href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/grahame%40starweave.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
> Click here to unsubscribe
> </a>
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: GKB Kyb paper 200411.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 287117 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20190319/1213ac03/attachment.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Cosmic system dynamics.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 173100 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20190319/1213ac03/attachment-0001.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: grav-overview.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 162985 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20190319/1213ac03/attachment-0002.pdf>