[General] Lorentzian transformations without Einsteinian spacetime?

[DataPacRat]

On 19/03/2019, Dr Grahame Blackwell <grahame at starweave.com> wrote:

> This also relates to a recent discussion in this group on 'propagation rate
> of gravitation': gravitation doesn't HAVE a rate of propagation - because it
> doesn't need to propagate, it's already there!  Hence 'instantaneous
> propagation'.

I'm open to the idea, but I'm not sure of the implications. For
example, how does this square with the results published by LIGO, of
the signals they describe as arising from black-hole collisions?


Thank you for your time,
--
DataPacRat
"Does aₘᵢₙ=2c²/Θ ? I don't know, but wouldn't it be fascinating if it were?"