[General] Single Component Model of Electrons

[Adam K]

Hi John,

I was surprised to see your diagrams. I thought I was the only one pursuing
models of this kind. Well done for striking so closely at the door of
truth!

Your paper would probably benefit from mention of the work of Milo Wolf,
Gabriel LaFreniere, Geoff Haselhurst, and others who have pursued the
spherical standing wave model of the electron. Their diagrams are basically
identical to yours (except for the spirals).

One problem that all of these authors have had is how to get the
inward-propagating waves. You mention Bragg reflection of vortex waves
entering resonance with the spacetime field. Do you have the details worked
out mathematically?

Also, many thanks for the appendix, which looks very useful.

Best wishes,

Adam

On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 10:17 AM John Macken <john at macken.com> wrote:

>
>
> Hello All,
>
>
>
>       I have been following the discussion, but I have not contributed for
> a long time. I have been working on a model of the universe based on the
> idea that the quantum vacuum is Planck length and Planck time vacuum
> fluctuations. This is a quantifiable starting assumption for a universal
> field which generates everything in the universe, including electrons. The
> attached paper draft titled *Single component model of the universe*,
> starts off by describing this basic building block. However, the second
> half of this paper tests this hypothesis by seeing if it can generate a
> model of an electron from the properties of the quantum vacuum.
>
>
>
>       This model addresses electron properties generally not addressed in
> this group. For example, an electron’s de Broglie wave characteristics give
> key insights into the required physical properties of an electron model.
> Since this research generates equations for the properties of the quantum
> vacuum, it is possible use these equations to test whether the model
> generates the electron’s energy, inertia, electric field and gravitational
> field. This model generates numerous falsifiable predictions. Some of these
> predictions can be easily tested. Other predictions require further
> analysis or experiments.
>
>
>
>       Besides the attached paper, there is a second attached PDF titled
> “Chapter 1 Appendix”. This is reference [19] in the paper. This reference
> is 2 pages out of a 400 page book. Therefore, it is easier to just attach
> this for this group. It contains several key calculations which form the
> basis of the electron model.
>
>
>
>
>
> John Macken
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light
> and Particles General Discussion List at afokay at gmail.com
> <a href="
> http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/afokay%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1
> ">
> Click here to unsubscribe
> </a>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20190508/43834797/attachment.html>