[General] New paper: Something is Rotten in the State of QED
Wolfgang Baer
support at nascentinc.com
Sun Apr 5 15:15:40 PDT 2020
Chandra:
I'm sitting in California rain and loving the quarantine
You have probably by now all heard of my "Conscious Action Book"
published by Routledge press that I selfishly believe is the most
advanced text on the 'Physics of Consciousness', a topic I consider the
grandest challenge to science in general and physics in particular.
By studying the physics that would be required to include a physical
basis of consciousness I have found it necessary to return to the last
time in history when physics was understandable and in conformity with
personal experience and intuition. Oliver Consa's comments are in my
opinion exactly what I found - almost a century of work around
development guided by engineering necessities and lacking a coherent
picture of any reality one can imagine.
My position and Conscious Action Theory in the history of western
thought is described below
My approach is to incorporate the 1st-person perspective as first
priority. If I cannot find myself, my existence, my own conscious living
being in a theory then that theory for me is simply an engineering tool
but such theories have no right or legitimacy in claiming to answer the
larger questions and claims to be finding God particles, origin of life,
who and what we really are, etc,etc.. Answers to these should not be
claimed by such theories.
In order to make progress I have specialized in establishing the
foundations of physics back to the time of Plank> The physics then was
understandable and most important in conformity with experience and
intuition. From that start point my physics is based upon Goldstien's
"Classical Mechanics" and Jackson's electrodynamics texts , which are
still used today.
The fundamental basis of these books is to assume the existence and
properties of mass, charge, space, time. These I understand intuitively.
I see space around me, feel time flow through me, feel the weight of
mass in the pull on my arm, and the effect of charge when I rub a rubber
rod in cats fur. These four items foundationally anchor my physics in my
experience and it is from this base that the beliefs of a conscious
being, "I" who wishes to know the world must be based.
The development of quantum theory and Einsteins relativity are both
incomplete because they try to develop theories without taking the human
creator of the theories into account and therefore represent complicated
work arounds precisely because they refuse to accept their own role in
creating the reality they hope to discover.
I also follow Whitehead =>de Broglie => Bohm(see diagram above) and go a
step farther. The wave function in my theory described thought in
physical terms as motion of material in which thought appears.
Think of a computer unplugged - its a system in equilibrium that just
sits there - you plug it in - electric disturbances propagate through
the formerly static equilibrium state - modifying and changing the
content of its memory. These disturbances are engineered by classic EM
laws, but more fundamentally the movement in the memory can
fundamentally be reduced to linear disturbances which appear in any
field of equilibrium material. And these disturbances are characterized
by Schroedinger's equation, SEE Appendix A5-1 in my book or Chapter 10
in Goldstien
There you have quantum theory in a nut shell.
Any stable system in equilibrium will host Schroedinger waves as long as
the disturbances are small enough so as not to destroy the memory
structure (Space) in which the disturbances propagate. .Furthermore when
those disturbances form self regenerating disturbance loops we have the
physical basis of conscious experiences.
appendix A5-2 defines the wave function as
The integral is a happening carried out by Nature, when carried out by
quantum physicists it hides the activity in the form e^2∙π∙ i when added
and multiplexed this form gives the Fourier transforms of quantum
Theory. We should replace fundamental particles with fundamental events
to straighten out physics and put it back on its proper course of
development.
When Applied to Relativity: There is obviously a background space. Every
piece of material is actually a self contains existence activity and
there is something it feels like to be that material. Einstein failed to
understand that his own thought experiments were always carried out in
his imagination which provides the ether or plenum as Bohm called it.
When applied to externalized physical experiments what theory explains
the construction, dismantling, and data analysis of a cyclotron, for
example? What theory describes our body behavior while doing our
experiment? This was my PhD thesis question in 1975. It was rejected
then as not being physics.
I had a long talk with Charles Townes *who was on my committee) and his
wife before he died - his answer was Christianity and God determines our
behavior- they were both quite happy with this answer. I was not, but
kept quiet out of politeness.
Times have changed - the Physics of Consciousness has now become a
legitimate topic of scientific inquiry.
And when applied to YOU: We are events and should think of ourselves as
interacting lifetimes. Linear disturbances in those lifetime equilibrium
structures are your thoughts. These propagate in the material of your
Brain as long as they are not so large that they destroy the apparatus
in which they propagate.
When they do get large they involve learning, growth and destruction,
death, CAT chapter 8 addresses these phenomena and chapter 5 shows how
Quantum theory is derived from CAT when the displacements remain in the
linear realm.
Glad the group is still alive and still thinking
Wolf
PS: the "Brain" referred to above is the real mechanism "You", which
generates the 1st-person experience not the observable brain which you
see in others and feel in the experience behind your nose that is part
of the experience generated i.e. the screen content not the computer.
On 4/1/2020 8:33 AM, Roychoudhuri, Chandra wrote:
>
> Hello everybody!
>
> I hope all of you are safe and well.
>
> Please, take all possible precautions to stay away from COVID-19. It
> is a ruthless virus, especially, if the body is compromised due to
> some other ailments.
>
> Fortunately, the real death rate is a tiny tiny fraction of one
> percent when you consider the global population to be over 7 Billion.
> Even the recovery rate is hovering around 96%, or better, for those
> who have been hospitalized with COVID-19.
>
> So relax, rest, exercise (especially, breathing exercises) and enjoy
> good food. Intellectual exercise is also an important component of
> maintaining good health.
>
> Thank you Viv, Oliver and everybody else for keeping up the
> discussions on the fact that the foundational physics-thinking has to
> be re-visited and re-structured from the very beginning.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Chandra.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
>
> On Mar 11, 2020, at 12:44 AM, Viv Robinson
> <viv at universephysics.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> *Message sent from a system outside of UConn.*
>
> Dear Oliver,
>
> Thank you for your report. I share your sentiments and express my
> displeasure in the following way. "/QED seems very good in
> obtaining an expression for the anomalous magnetic moment of an
> electron, that differs from the actual by about 1%, yet in another
> field it requires the universe to have an energy density of ≈
> 10^120 higher than is measured/". I guess that is one of "*The
> problem of infinities*”. I am of the opinion that it is better to
> have a theory that explains the 10^-10 J/m^3 density of the
> universe and differs by about 1% for the observed value of the
> electron’s magnetic moment, than to have something that differs by
> 10^120 but accurately explains an error of ≈ 1%
>
> Cheers,
>
> Vivian Robinson
>
> On 11 March 2020 at 7:12:36 AM, oliver consa
> (oliver.consa at gmail.com <mailto:oliver.consa at gmail.com>) wrote:
>
> Dear fellow scientist,
>
> I send you this mail because you have been skeptical about
> Foundations of Physics. I think that this new paper will be of
> your interest. Feel free to share it with your colleagues or
> publish it on the web. I consider it important that this paper
> serves to open a public debate on this subject.
>
>
> *Something is Rotten in the State of QED*
> https://vixra.org/pdf/2002.0011v1.pdf
> <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fvixra.org%2Fpdf%2F2002.0011v1.pdf&data=02%7C01%7Cchandra.roychoudhuri%40uconn.edu%7Cdb01eb5ef52b4a1b4d3c08d7c576e8d1%7C17f1a87e2a254eaab9df9d439034b080%7C0%7C1%7C637194986815736302&sdata=xPq35pGnn6OvvNIfzev7F6sQCh5imxPkhxdcimEs1JM%3D&reserved=0>
>
> Abstract
> /"Quantum electrodynamics (QED) is considered the most
> accurate theory in the history of science. However, this
> precision is based on a single experimental value: the
> anomalous magnetic moment of the electron (g-factor). An
> examination of QED history reveals that this value was
> obtained using illegitimate mathematical traps, manipulations
> and tricks. These traps included the fraud of Kroll & Karplus,
> who acknowledged that they lied in their presentation of the
> most relevant calculation in QED history. As we will
> demonstrate in this paper, the Kroll & Karplus scandal was not
> a unique event. Instead, the scandal represented the
> fraudulent manner in which physics has been conducted from the
> creation of QED through today." (12 pag.)/
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Oliver Consa
> oliver.consa at gmail.com <mailto:oliver.consa at gmail.com>
>
> _______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature
> of Light and Particles General Discussion List at
> viv at universephysics.com
> <a
> href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/viv%40universephysics.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
> Click here to unsubscribe
> </a>
>
> _______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of
> Light and Particles General Discussion List at
> chandra.roychoudhuri at uconn.edu
> <a
> href="https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.natureoflightandparticles.org%2Foptions.cgi%2Fgeneral-natureoflightandparticles.org%2Fchandra.roychoudhuri%2540uconn.edu%3Funsub%3D1%26unsubconfirm%3D1&data=02%7C01%7Cchandra.roychoudhuri%40uconn.edu%7Cdb01eb5ef52b4a1b4d3c08d7c576e8d1%7C17f1a87e2a254eaab9df9d439034b080%7C0%7C0%7C637194986815756290&sdata=06dpAu0Zoukum194UXH7fpnBQW6eujWF0TtEx0LhyRM%3D&reserved=0">
> Click here to unsubscribe
> </a>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at Wolf at nascentinc.com
> <a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
> Click here to unsubscribe
> </a>
--
Dr. Wolfgang Baer
Nascent Systems Inc.
Wolf at NascentInc.com
Tel 831-659-3120
Fax 831-659-0432
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20200405/6004dae6/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: kkefjkjloebpfaem.png
Type: image/png
Size: 218062 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20200405/6004dae6/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: amlomdeahejdcglo.png
Type: image/png
Size: 7063 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20200405/6004dae6/attachment-0001.png>
More information about the General
mailing list