[General] muon g-2 experiment results

[Roychoudhuri, Chandra]

Dear Oliver:
Many thanks, for your article giving the historical origin of the creeping-in deceptive culture within mathematical physics, QED being an example.

I have attached one of my recent publication. In this paper, have preserved my causal brain and honest opinions. Yes, sometimes I have "gone out on a limb"; but still I have maintained causality!

If you have any comments, feel free to respond.

Chandra.

From: General <general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org> On Behalf Of oliver consa
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2021 3:40 AM
To: oliver consa <oliver.consa at gmail.com>
Subject: [General] muon g-2 experiment results

*Message sent from a system outside of UConn.*


Dear colleagues:


First Results from Fermilab's Muon g-2 Experiment show strong evidence that our best theoretical model of the subatomic world is incomplete.<https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bnl.gov%2Fnewsroom%2Fnews.php%3Fa%3D118760&data=04%7C01%7C%7C62b7929515fb421df1ea08d90ab7e234%7C17f1a87e2a254eaab9df9d439034b080%7C0%7C0%7C637552607179281211%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=tOnb%2FqMycA%2B7%2B2jVXjK9s3reYiVO2PBE8euvYY35dKY%3D&reserved=0>


This evident discrepancy of the experimental data with respect to the theoretical data should make us doubt about the validity of Quantum electrodynamics (QED). However, it seems that no one is willing to question the validity of the QED and the scientific community prefers to propose new hypotheses to solve the discrepancy (new elementary particles, new fundamental forces, etc ...).


A year ago, we already anticipated this situation and published this paper:


Something is Rotten in the State of QED<https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fvixra.org%2Fabs%2F2002.0011&data=04%7C01%7C%7C62b7929515fb421df1ea08d90ab7e234%7C17f1a87e2a254eaab9df9d439034b080%7C0%7C0%7C637552607179281211%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=rZAY32vp95I9HbWCLtgnvrQFvAcfwzp7cqHyurmCNww%3D&reserved=0>

"Quantum electrodynamics (QED) is considered the most accurate theory in the history of science. However, this precision is based on a single experimental value: the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron (g-factor). An examination of QED history reveals that this value was obtained using illegitimate mathematical traps, manipulations and tricks. These traps included the fraud of Kroll & Karplus, who acknowledged that they lied in their presentation of the most relevant calculation in QED history. As we will demonstrate in this paper, the Kroll & Karplus scandal was not a unique event. Instead, the scandal represented the fraudulent manner in which physics has been conducted from the creation of QED through today." (12 pag)


The paper is fun to read and is already in the Vixra Top 500<https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.vixrapedia.org%2Fwiki%2FVixra_Top_500&data=04%7C01%7C%7C62b7929515fb421df1ea08d90ab7e234%7C17f1a87e2a254eaab9df9d439034b080%7C0%7C0%7C637552607179291206%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=pdi7UsGEmYQu1ft6auCM9BTSwIzbJjizD0Ce%2FrTKBHY%3D&reserved=0>. But if you think that vixra is an unreliable source and the tone of the paper is too rude for your taste, you can also read a more objective and polite version published in ARXIV: "The Unpublished Feynman Diagram IIc<https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2010.10345&data=04%7C01%7C%7C62b7929515fb421df1ea08d90ab7e234%7C17f1a87e2a254eaab9df9d439034b080%7C0%7C0%7C637552607179291206%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=XGBzf5sz5hvZXXByENYC347ZopQ7OgkF4%2FxgnwqV14k%3D&reserved=0>"


Best Regards,

Oliver Consa
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20210430/61d600db/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 2021.2_JMP_Ether Unifying Field.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 986871 bytes
Desc: 2021.2_JMP_Ether Unifying Field.pdf
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20210430/61d600db/attachment.pdf>