[General] HA: Arxiv paper: Something is wrong in the state of QED

[oliver consa]

Dear Alexander,

Thank you very much for your interest in this paper.




El vie, 15 oct 2021 a las 9:55, Burinskii A.Ya. (<bur at ibrae.ac.ru>)
escribió:

> Dear Oliver,
>
> Thank you very much for new version of your article.
> It is very interesting, and I expect to cite it in my further publication.
> I am working now for a stringy version of the Dirac electron as a
> Kerr-Newman black hole.
> What is your opinion about the point that anomalous magnetic momentum
> is result of interaction of the electron with external  em field, and thus,
> it is not proper electron's magnetic momentum.
>
> Best regards, Alexander
>
> ________________________________
> От: oliver consa [oliver.consa at gmail.com]
> Отправлено: 10 октября 2021 г. 13:06
> Кому: oliver consa
> Тема: [General] Arxiv paper: Something is wrong in the state of QED
>
>
> Dear colleague,
>
>
> I am sending you this paper because I am convinced will be of interest to
> you:
>
>
> Something is wrong in the state of QED
>
> https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.02078
>
>
> “Quantum electrodynamics (QED) is considered the most accurate theory in
> the history of science. However, this precision is based on a single
> experimental value: the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron
> (g-factor). An examination of the history of QED reveals that this value
> was obtained in a very suspicious way. These suspicions include the case of
> Karplus & Kroll, who admitted to having lied in their presentation of the
> most relevant calculation in the history of QED. As we will demonstrate in
> this paper, the Karplus & Kroll affair was not an isolated case, but one in
> a long series of errors, suspicious coincidences, mathematical
> inconsistencies and renormalized infinities swept under the rug.”
>
>
>
> This paper raises important questions about the validity and legitimacy of
> the QED. I believe that it is a topic that deserves a greater diffusion and
> a public debate.
>
>
> It is an improved and corrected version of a popular previous paper
> published by me on Vixra. The information has been expanded and corrected,
> much more respectful language has been used, and most subjective
> interpretations of the facts have been eliminated.
>
>
> I hope you enjoy it
>
>
> Best Wishes,
>
> Oliver Consa
>
> _______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light
> and Particles General Discussion List at oliver.consa at gmail.com
> <a href="
> http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/oliver.consa%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1
> ">
> Click here to unsubscribe
> </a>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20211016/66e7ba05/attachment.html>