[General] HA: Arxiv paper: Something is wrong in the state of QED

Burinskii A.Ya. bur at ibrae.ac.ru
Fri Oct 15 00:54:12 PDT 2021


Dear Oliver,

Thank you very much for new version of your article.
It is very interesting, and I expect to cite it in my further publication.
I am working now for a stringy version of the Dirac electron as a  Kerr-Newman black hole.
What is your opinion about the point that anomalous magnetic momentum
is result of interaction of the electron with external  em field, and thus,
it is not proper electron's magnetic momentum.

Best regards, Alexander

________________________________
От: oliver consa [oliver.consa at gmail.com]
Отправлено: 10 октября 2021 г. 13:06
Кому: oliver consa
Тема: [General] Arxiv paper: Something is wrong in the state of QED


Dear colleague,


I am sending you this paper because I am convinced will be of interest to you:


Something is wrong in the state of QED

https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.02078


“Quantum electrodynamics (QED) is considered the most accurate theory in the history of science. However, this precision is based on a single experimental value: the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron (g-factor). An examination of the history of QED reveals that this value was obtained in a very suspicious way. These suspicions include the case of Karplus & Kroll, who admitted to having lied in their presentation of the most relevant calculation in the history of QED. As we will demonstrate in this paper, the Karplus & Kroll affair was not an isolated case, but one in a long series of errors, suspicious coincidences, mathematical inconsistencies and renormalized infinities swept under the rug.”



This paper raises important questions about the validity and legitimacy of the QED. I believe that it is a topic that deserves a greater diffusion and a public debate.


It is an improved and corrected version of a popular previous paper published by me on Vixra. The information has been expanded and corrected, much more respectful language has been used, and most subjective interpretations of the facts have been eliminated.


I hope you enjoy it


Best Wishes,

Oliver Consa



More information about the General mailing list