[General] research papers

[Eric Reiter]

Hello Al K.  I read in your paper that you welcomed a beam-split coincidence experiment that defied the photon model.  http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=2441836&resultClick=1 ,  my SPIE 2015 paper.  I welcome anyone to see it in Pacifica CA.  ThanksEric Reiter
 
      From: "af.kracklauer at web.de" <af.kracklauer at web.de>
 To: phys at a-giese.de; general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org 
Cc: Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion <general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>; Joakim Pettersson <joakimbits at gmail.com>; Ariane Mandray <ariane.mandray at wanadoo.fr> 
 Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2015 8:11 AM
 Subject: Re: [General] research papers
   
Hi All: In paper No. 11 on www.nonloco-physics.0catch.com  I published some ideas on the origin and nanture of deBroglie waves.  Seems to me some of the objections and obscurities mentioned below are delt with therein.  Take a look, see what you think.   ciao,  Al Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015 um 15:39 Uhr
Von: "Dr. Albrecht Giese" <genmail at a-giese.de>
An: "Richard Gauthier" <richgauthier at gmail.com>
Cc: "Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion" <general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>, "Joakim Pettersson" <joakimbits at gmail.com>, "Ariane Mandray" <ariane.mandray at wanadoo.fr>
Betreff: Re: [General] research papersHello Richard (and all),

thank you, Richard, for your informations. You find my answers and comments in your text.

However I see here two general problems which should be reviewed by all.

1.) The fact that the de Broglie wave regarding its definition and its use is not Lorentz-invariant. So it is incompatible with our physical understanding since 1905.

2.) If the photon is seen as the ingredient of the electron, we need a much clearer definition and understanding what the photon is and what its effects are in detail (like the wave front emitted). Otherwise there are too many insufficiently defined situations as visible in the discussion further down. -  And clearly we do not get any help from quantum mechanics for this, after Heisenberg has stated that it is completely useless to look into an elementary particle, and the physical community has accepted this since that time.
 
_______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at eric at unquantum.net
<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/eric%40unquantum.net?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
Click here to unsubscribe
</a>


   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20151028/aec66a58/attachment.htm>