[General] reply to Albrecht's email

[Albrecht Giese]

Dear John Hodge,

thank you for your comment. I have looked into the first one of the 
papers you have given in your mail. I have the impression that I should 
have followed the preceding discussion about your model, I missed that 
as there were too many other activities at my place. To understand your 
model I should at least have to understand what Hods are and what the 
plenum is. Without this knowledge I cannot follow sufficiently.

Anyway, I have two comments to your first paper. 1.) You base your 
model, as you write, to the Equivalence Principle. As far as I remember, 
we have discussed this topic here already. To my knowledge the 
Equivalence Principle (i.e. the equivalence of gravitation and 
acceleration) is falsified. One example: If an observer carries a 
charged particle with him, it will radiate at acceleration, but not at 
rest in a gravitational field. So, both can be distinguished. 2.) I have 
a completely different understanding of gravitation: In my understanding 
it is not the force no. 4 as main stream physics assumes. On the 
contrary, it is no force at all but a refraction process, caused by the 
varying speed of light in a gravitational field, which influences the 
internal oscillation in elementary particles and causes them to be 
accelerated towards the source of the gravitational field.

This is for today.

Best regards
Albrecht


Am 10.04.2016 um 10:50 schrieb Hodge John:
> Albrecht:
> I like your emphasis on experiment.
> The STOE model suggests the extent characteristic is where the inertia 
> resides. The STOE posits the plenum (like “space” of GR) and hods. The 
> Hods are 2 dimensional and causes gravitational forces. The plenum has 
> the extent and inertia. A photon is a column of hods with plenum 
> between the hods. Hence, the extent is where the inertia is.
> Inertia according to the STOE 
> http://intellectualarchive.com/?link=item&id=1676
> Further the diffraction experiment is a new experiment that is easy to 
> do for yourself. The STOE photon model is the only model not rejected 
> by this experiment. I urge you to do the experiment.
> Diffraction experiment and its STOE photon simulation program rejects 
> wave models of light http://intellectualarchive.com/?link=item&id=1603
> I think this may be the experiment you are seeking. It rejects wave 
> models. Because light and electrons display diffraction effects, the 
> electron rather than a photon in the experiment should work the same. 
> I think your model will fail the experiment. But then it should be done.
> Papers referenced in this paper explain how the photon works. The 
> extent of the photon and its inertia and gravitational forces are 
> needed for the math to work. The math works and no other model is 
> consistent with this experiment result.
> When an electron and positron are collided, only photons result. This, 
> I think, supports the idea that electrons are composed of photons.
> Structure and spin of the neutrino, electron, and positron
> http://intellectualarchive.com/?link=item&id=1694
> Hodge
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at phys at a-giese.de
> <a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/phys%40a-giese.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
> Click here to unsubscribe
> </a>



---
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20160419/5cc24665/attachment.htm>