[General] inertia

Wed Feb 24 21:09:20 PST 2016

Hodge and Wolf,
It would seem that the simplest explanation for the origin of inertia of an electron is in the circulating momentum of a light-speed particle (charged spin-1/2 photon) forming the electron. Changing momentum requires a force, even for the circulating charged photon within a resting electron. This explains quantitatively why the electron requires a force to accelerate it, proportional to the magnitude of the circulating momentum mc or Eo/c inside the electron, and therefore providing the electron with its inertial mass Eo/c^2 .
      Richard

> On Feb 22, 2016, at 2:33 PM, Hodge John <jchodge at frontier.com> wrote:
> 
> Wolf:
> The STOE postulates a plenum (after Descartes idea) is similar to the ether, “space” of general relativity, and gravitational ether with some differences. The General Relativity didn’t use Mach’s principle in its final version. So, the plenum’s relation to Mach’s principle is very nearly the same as the “space” view of Mach’s principle. The scalar potential value ($\rho$) at all points in space (3D space) is caused by all masses, sources and sinks in the universe. The equation in the paper has a factor of $\rho$. The quantum concept of “local” is abandoned. The “local” concept had to be created to distinguish the action within a speed of light cone or outside the cone. The STOE postulates the speed of waves in the plenum travel at over 10^7 $c$ (Thomas C Van Flandern). So within our limit of measure the waves can effect actions. Thus, the “spooky action at a distance” (entanglement) is within the distance limit of plenum waves. This was used in the diffraction paper that rejected Huygens-postulate-based models (all wave models).
> The diffraction paper also used the idea the speed of photons (light) varies with $\rho$, but not as Albrechts refractive index idea. The gravitational field (proportional to the $\vec{\nabla} \rho$) implies the $\rho$ changes and, therefore, the speed of light varies in varying gravitational field.
> Please expand on your third question. Special relativity holds the speed of light in “empty space” constant. The STOE suggest $c$ depends on $\rho$ and that there is no “empty space”.
> Or, are you addressing the Lorentz factor? (I like the Lorentz Ether Theory model rather than special relativity). I had thought that if the paper idea of inertia can be put into a form of $\dot{v} = K v$ which would produce a exponent growth factor to some upper limit ($c$) we could get the Lorentz factor for time and length measurements. What other fundamental postulates would be need?
>  
> Hodge
> 
> 
> On Monday, February 22, 2016 3:57 PM, Wolfgang Baer <wolf at nascentinc.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> John:
> 
> Thank you for the reference, which in turn cites a long list of papers that presumably present the details.
> 
> Before digging in further I wonder if this work will shed light on Mach's principle and the idea that the interaction between a local mass and the mass of distant stars is the origin of inertia? On top of that do  these ideas address whether it is the speed of light that actually changes in a gravitational field as Albrechts gravity as a refraction index phenomena would suggest. And thirdly could special relativity be explained as a kind of inertial phenomena affecting the speed of light.
> 
> THe speed of light seems to be inside everyone's model of the internals of material. perhaps we could simplify things if gravity and inertia effect its speed which changes clock rates and sizes instead of assuming its constant and asjusting the rest of the world to make that assumption work. 
> 
> best,
> wolf
> 
> Dr. Wolfgang Baer
> Research Director
> Nascent Systems Inc.
> tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
> E-mail wolf at NascentInc.com <mailto:wolf at NascentInc.com>
> On 2/19/2016 10:23 PM, Hodge John wrote:
>> This is another suggestion for inertia. It is a consideration to lead to the structure of the neutrino and electron.
>>  
>>  <https://www.academia.edu/22205666/Inertia_according_to_the_STOE>https://www.academia.edu/22205666/Inertia_according_to_the_STOE <https://www.academia.edu/22205666/Inertia_according_to_the_STOE>
>>  
>> Inertia according to the STOE
>>  
>> The Scalar Theory of Everything (STOE) model of photons is extended to model the inertia of mass. The characteristic of the plenum, hods, and their interactions yields the Newtonian characteristics of gravitational mass and inertial mass. The Equivalence Principle is derived from these characteristics rather having to be assumed. The characteristics have been used to derive the STOE photon diffraction model. An experiment has rejected all other diffraction models.
>>  
>> Hodge
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at Wolf at nascentinc.com <mailto:Wolf at nascentinc.com>
>> <a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1" <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1>>
>> Click here to unsubscribe
>> </a>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at jchodge at frontier.com <mailto:jchodge at frontier.com>
> <a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/jchodge%40frontier.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1 <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/jchodge%40frontier.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1>">
> Click here to unsubscribe
> </a>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at richgauthier at gmail.com
> <a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/richgauthier%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
> Click here to unsubscribe
> </a>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20160224/f8f88ca6/attachment.htm>