[General] cosmological red shift

[Roychoudhuri, Chandra]

Dear Wolf:
You are correct that I have not presented my logic in sufficient details to make my assertion that the Cosmological Redshift is definitely not a Doppler Phenomenon. I have to think through more and make secondary paper substantiate further. I need more time.

I am actually inspired Nobel Laureate Hubble himself. Apparently he was never satisfied with the Doppler sift explanations. I have more thinking to do.

Further, I also strongly believe that the optical Doppler shift, like Doppler shift of sound waves, have two separate effects. Source movement creates a real (permanent) frequency shift of the quantum frequency. Then this shift can be experienced as a wide variety of frequencies by different detectors (spectrometers) moving at different velocities. This was Doppler's original postulate with ether as the tension field. This is equivalent to stationary air-pressure tension field for sound waves. So I need a stationary Complex Tension Field (CTF), or modified ether, to sustain the perpetual velocity of light as c (the tension properties being epsilon and mu). CTF is the cosmic inertial reference frame in which everything is being played out.

Chandra.


From: General [mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org] On Behalf Of Wolfgang Baer
Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2016 3:35 PM
To: general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org
Subject: [General] cosmological red shift

Chandrasekhar;
Reading your "could space be considered as the inertial rest frame" in the SPIE vol 9570
I would very much like to find an alternative explanation for the red shift and am interested in your absorption line argument
but do not understand your logic.

If a star is moving away from us both the inner and outer corona are moving at the same velocity.
The inner corona atom emits light "f0'that is red shifted To "f" in the media due to its motion
The outer corona atom absorbs light at frequency "f" that is blue shifted relative to its natural "f0' frequency because it is moving toward the source
This leaves a hole in the spectra in the media at "f" red shifted
An atom on earth is not moving toward the source and therefore the arriving light will still be at red shift frequency "f"
atoms on the earth with natural "f0' frequency will not be able to absorb the light

All light frequencies shift and the hole at "f" is red shifted due to the motion of the star away from us.
Why do you say this is not a doppler effect?

I would like to find a gravitational argument rather than a Doppler argument fro the red shift, but do not understand how your argument works.
What am I doing Wrong?

Wolf


Dr. Wolfgang Baer

Research Director

Nascent Systems Inc.

tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432

E-mail wolf at NascentInc.com<mailto:wolf at NascentInc.com>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20160125/f8bee5ee/attachment.htm>