[General] Path of photons Fig1

[Vladimir Tamari]

Hi Hodge
Thanks - without seeing your simulation paper I did not realize your model photon paths cross.
There are so many ways conceptual and mathematical to describe various aspects of the same physical phenomena, but eventually it becomes obvious one explanation fits in better with others and describes nature more economically and elegantly.

A model can work within its given parameters but not in others. Apart from the several possible wave models of diffraction, Heisenberg showed that diffraction can be a consequence of the uncertainty principle. But in view of several experimental results annuling diffraction  (not mine) this is obviously wrong.

I am now convinced, initially through my own conclusions about the double slit experiment in a streamline context and the idea of gradual absorption, that Einstein's point photon concept is simply wrong. This has been experimentally proven by Eric Reiter. And Compton himself had given an alternative  wave explanation for his effect as Reiter found out.

The Couder / walking drop experiment is very interesting, and may be an excellent model for particle diffraction, not of light. 
http://youtu.be/W9yWv5dqSKk

Thank you for reading my papers written so long ago!
Best,
Vladimir


_____________________
vladimirtamari.com

> On Mar 5, 2016, at 3:28 AM, Hodge John <jchodge at frontier.com> wrote:
> 
> Vladimir:
> Thanks for your links.
>  
> Fig. 1 is a trace of the path of the photons (particles not waves and not streamlines) of the simulation program. Note the paths cross (therefore not streamlines). I also note that the “walking drop” experiments also show a similar pattern of each drop through the slit producing a diffraction pattern. This was presented in a Physics Today article the end of last year. Drops going through the left side ended on the right side of the diffraction pattern.
> “Varying intensity across the slit” means more photons go through one side of the slit. Or, the model of the wave intensity must have greater intensity on one side of the slit than the other. The “Diffraction experiment …” paper explains the experimental apparatus to accomplish this.
> I’ve printed your papers. Thanks. I’ll read them soon (today).
> Hodge
>  
> _______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at vladimirtamari at hotmail.com
> <a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/vladimirtamari%40hotmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
> Click here to unsubscribe
> </a>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20160305/b8c458e6/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at vladimirtamari at hotmail.com
<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/vladimirtamari%40hotmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
Click here to unsubscribe
</a>