[General] Structure of electron

Tue Mar 29 01:40:19 PDT 2016

Hodge,

I've not had time to follow the conversations since the twins were born.
However, you made a point that I would like feedback on from any and all
people.

"Rotating anything must emit radiation. What keeps it from exhaustion?"

Physics in the English language has been diluted enough that there is not a
distinction between emitted and radiated. It is considered equal to say
that a photon was emitted or radiated from an atom. However, I would like
to say that EM energy was emitted as a photon, but radiated either as a
photon or as a standing wave (remaining bound to the electron). The
difference being that, until conditions are correct, the bound EM radiation
cannot form a photon and must remain attached to the source. The primary
conditions for a solitonic photon is the ang mom of hbar and the energy and
frequency relationship. If the source has no ang mom or ability to transfer
sufficient ang mom, then it cannot radiate. (Does going from spin 1/2 to
spin -1/2 give change in ang mom of 1? Can it happen w/o external
influence?)

An orbiting electron does not emit photons for this reason. Does it
radiate? Absolutely! How do you resolve the situation?

If you have thoughts on the subject, I would appreciate (but, maybe not
agree with) them.

Andrew
___________________________

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Hodge John <jchodge at frontier.com> wrote:

> David:
> “made of” - your thinking in the standard model. Magnetism is the property
> of the smallest particle - the hod. As I mention in the photon
> construction. In any model, there must be a start. As I mention in the 1st
> paragraph of the discussion - magnetism (2 poles N and S) rather than a
> positive of negative charge is a property of the smallest particle. The
> charge then must be derived from the magnetic field rather than the
> magnetic field of rotation charges.
>
> Others have suggested a circulating something. A circulating anything is
> inconsistent with the variable illumination of the diffraction and
> interference experiment (hodge2015a and 2015c). That is the photon must
> generate a diffraction wave like a linear array of dipole antennas (the
> analogy). Circulating anything that then goes to make a photon assembly
> becomes incredibly complex and unlikely. The photon must have variable
> energy to make the different frequencies. That is circulating quanta is
> inconsistent with the experiment.
>
> But I see you suggest one model. So the challenge is to match the
> properties with the experimental results such as in hodge2015c. I don’t see
> how to do it.
>
> Rotating anything must emit radiation. What keeps it from exhaustion?
>
> Hodge
>
>
> On Monday, March 28, 2016 2:18 PM, "davidmathes8 at yahoo.com" <
> davidmathes8 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> John
>
> Interesting work by explaining that only elementary particle theory is
> needed and not spacetime theories.
>
> > The polarization of photons in a magnetic field suggests the photons are
> magnets.
>
> And what is the magnet made of? Are we talking of an oscillating monopole
> states or some sub-elementary (sub-sub-atomic) particle such as an energy,
> quanta or quantized spacetime?
>
> If there is an quanta circulating within a photon, could it be that the
> quanta has both subliminal and superluminal velocities, and we can only see
> the subliminal. With twisted light, the paper suggest a c - 0.1% variation
> and the mere possibility that  c + 0.1% variation might be enough to block
> direct observation of FTL.
>
> Just like the photonic electron models, could there be a quanta
> circulating within the photon in some topology such as a cylinder or washer
> configuration. After all, the parametric equations for a photonic electron
> can produce both topologies of ring and spindle torus. If one tunes the variables
> in the parametric equation, cylinder and washer topologies can be
> obtained. In either case, the quanta would travel forward on the inner
> surface and return on the outer surface.
>
> Obviously , the cylinder would support the magnet theory of the photon.
> However, so would a soliton wave with a washer topology.
>
> This leaves open the possibility that the sub-elementary particle may be a
> resonant circulating g magnetic monopole.
>
> David
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Hodge John <jchodge at frontier.com>
> *To:* "general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org" <
> general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
> *Sent:* Friday, March 25, 2016 9:52 PM
> *Subject:* [General] Structure of electron
>
> This may be of interest.
>
>
> https://www.academia.edu/23702413/Structure_and_spin_of_the_neutrino_electron_and_positron
>
> Structure and spin of the neutrino, electron, and positron
>
> The Scalar Theory of Everything (STOE) model of photons is extended to a
> model of the structure of neutrinos, electrons and positrons. The
> polarization of photons in a magnetic field suggests the photons are
> magnets. This observation and the STOE model of the photon suggest the hods
> are magnetic. Using disc magnets as an analogy of hods suggests the
> structure of elementary particles. The relative abundance of elementary
> particles and anti--particles is dependent on their relative probability of
> formation that depends on the difficulty of forming their structure. The
> structure of the neutrino explains why its velocity is the velocity of
> photons. The structure of large neutrinos suggests how they can transform
> into electron neutrinos. The position of north seeking magnetic poles
> relative to the direction of movement is qualitatively consistent with the
> ``spin'' observation. The postulate of ``space quantization'' is
> unnecessary. The structure models are consistent with several observations
> of elementary particle behavior.
>
> Hodge
>
> _______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light
> and Particles General Discussion List at davidmathes8 at yahoo.com
> <a href="
> http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/davidmathes8%40yahoo.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1
> ">
> Click here to unsubscribe
> </a>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light
> and Particles General Discussion List at mules333 at gmail.com
> <a href="
> http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/mules333%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1
> ">
> Click here to unsubscribe
> </a>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20160329/3b414b59/attachment.htm>