[General] Gravitational Wave - Vacuum Energy Paper Submitted

[Vladimir Tamari]

Hi John Macken
Interesting - your priority in gravitational wave detection theory through polarization.
 
You wrote   " I took an entirely different approach than everyone else in the group.  Everyone else starts with what I call the "top down" approach to physics." 

Not me! I tend to agree with you that important advances can hopefully be made by creating models from first principles, as I also have http://vladimirtamari.com/beautiful_univ_rev_oct_2011.pdf .  The trouble with this approach is that it assumes much of modern physics, like the concept of space-time or quantum probability or particle -wave duality even time as a dimension is 'excess baggage'. Most streamline physicists are  reluctant to jettison their hard-won expertise in these fields and start on a new tack. The answer my friend is blowin' in the [ether] wind!
Cheers
Vladimir 

_____________________
vladimirtamari.com

> On Sep 1, 2016, at 3:40 AM, John Macken <jmacken at stmarys-ca.edu> wrote:
> 
> In fact, I would say that this article fills the critical gap in the theory.  I took an entirely different approach than everyone else in the group.  Everyone else starts with what I call the "top down" approach to physics.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20160905/4c498284/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at vladimirtamari at hotmail.com
<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/vladimirtamari%40hotmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
Click here to unsubscribe
</a>