[General] quanta

[Roychoudhuri, Chandra]

     I am sorry, Hodge, I am unable to follow your logic, most probably because I am not a specialist in Gravity. Here is my last attempt to summarize my understanding of Superposition Effect (diffraction and interference).

     Just as our basic steps of math imply, superposition effect takes shape through two steps: (i) resonant joint stimulation of the detecting dipole by all the E-vectors and then (ii) quadratic absorption of energy from the field by the dipole. [Quadratic re-direction of energy in case of classical beam combiner in an interferometer. See my attached presentation.]

     First, more than one physical signal must simultaneously stimulate a detecting dipole complex. [The English word "superposition" and the math we use, directly imply the physical presence of more than one signal.] The stimulated dipole complex oscillate at the E-vector frequency. This stimulation is Schrodinger's "Psi". If the frequency is quantum mechanically resonant with the required transition energy, Delta-E = hv; then only the second step of square modulus operation can be executed by the detecting dipole and an amount of energy Delta-E is absorbed. This second step is "Psi*Psi". These are the two distinct physical process steps.

     Dark fringe on a detector array does not mean there was no light wave ("photon") passing through that region. Out of phase E-vectors cannot stimulate the dipole and hence, the dipole cannot absorb any energy from the out-of-phase field. These are causal physical process steps.

     The Superposition effect is a "local" phenomenon executed by tiny detecting dipoles. It could be both classical (bulk assembly of dipoles as in a beam-combiner, without quantum resonance; and quantized dipole transition with quantum resonance.)

     By the way, wave amplitudes by themselves, cannot re-organize their energy distribution to generate fringes in the absence of interacting material medium. This is my re-discovery of a thousand year old knowledge that light does not interact with light in the linear domain in the absence of interacting material medium. I have generalized it all tension-field based waves.

     If you think that "dark fringe" is where "photon" does not arrive; then you need a separate force, extending from the slit to the far-field detector plane; which guides the "photons" with apriori knowledge of all the local and remote details of the apparatus. This not causal thinking. Alfred Lande (of fame "Lande g-factor") had spent many years trying to developing this "dark fringe as non-arrival of 'photons'" without logical success. Am. J. Of Physics has published his paper series.

    Also, think, how does EM waves ("photons") can propagate perpetually through the entire universe, with a staggeringly high velocity, without any support from the emitter? If the space is the right kind of tension field to support EM wave propagation; then a big chunk of the problem is solved.

Chandra.

================================

-----Original Message-----
From: General [mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org] On Behalf Of Hodge John
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2017 1:24 PM
To: general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org
Subject: [General] quanta



Chandra

I feel a bit uncomfortable about where we seem to heading.

There is the experiment. The simulation reqires a wave in a gravitational aether type medium. The unsettling part of this is that this requires the "space" (aether)  to be the cause of inertia. Matter has inertia because of the space between bound elementary particles.

I followed the recent discussions on inertia. I'm thinking about this and the experiment result now without a direction.

If the discrete quanta can do as the simulation does, it may solve my inertia problem. Howver, if the only thing it does is solve the schroendinger equation, well Bohm does that too.

Hodge

_______________________________________________

If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at chandra.roychoudhuri at uconn.edu<mailto:chandra.roychoudhuri at uconn.edu> <a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/chandra.roychoudhuri%40uconn.edu?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">

Click here to unsubscribe

</a>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20170206/954a6b91/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 161202_IITkp_SE& Q.Cup.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 1469656 bytes
Desc: 161202_IITkp_SE& Q.Cup.pdf
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20170206/954a6b91/attachment.pdf>