[General] HA: Gravity

[Wolfgang Baer]

Graham:

I'm working on  a paper that is entitled "the speed of Now" in which I 
make an argument that the constant "c" should net be associated with the 
speed of light but rather the speed with which our individual and 
perhaps collective perception travels, i.e processes, its way through a 
block memory space time. This sounds like tangible physicalization of 
your ideas, No?

Along those lines I

/Fourth Test of General Relativity/, Shapiro wrote:/Physical Review 
Letters <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_Review_Letters>/. *13* 
(26): 789–791.

    "Because, according to the general theory, the *speed of a light
    wave depends on the strength of the gravitational potential along
    its path,* these time delays should thereby be increased by almost
    2x10^−4 sec when the radar pulses pass near the sun. Such a change,
    equivalent to 60 km in distance, could now be measured over the
    required path length to within about 5 to 10% with presently
    obtainable equipment.

It is the constancy assumption of the speed of light that justifies 
special and general relativity. Perhaps we should be thinking of gravity 
more as an instantaneous , non shielding mass to mass effect, that 
provides a force in a flat background,which interacts with charges  and 
their EM fields to change the construction of our EM measureing 
instruments that define space and time in the first place?? Wolf



Dr. Wolfgang Baer
Research Director
Nascent Systems Inc.
tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
E-mail wolf at NascentInc.com

On 5/7/2017 2:38 PM, Dr Grahame Blackwell wrote:
> Wolf,
> Thanks for your response.
> I agree that:
> (a) Equations match corresponding values, they do not necessarily 
> imply causation;
> (b) As I indicate in my starred footnote (previous email), my broader 
> view of reality includes the possibility of some form of 
> time-independent 'higher causation' - which in turn posits a 
> 'time-independent' higher reality; from that higher perspective it is 
> my view, as you suggest, that we (i.e. our consciousness[es - but 
> actually all one]) traverse the totality of atemporal reality in a way 
> that gives us a sensation of 'time' * - however it shouldn't be taken 
> from this that this atemporal reality is set in stone, I believe that 
> it is fluid, changeable, in a sense that's beyond our comprehension 
> (at present), responding to the collective input of all 
> consciousness.  If we are to rise above the train-tracks that 
> conventional science is currently stuck in and move our thinking 
> forward, we must be prepared - once again, as Hertz did - to accept 
> the possibility that there are aspects of reality beyond our 
> perception and actively seek out those aspects: only then will we 
> overcome limitations that we have imposed on ourselves by our limited 
> world-view.
> * Note that this implies that what we see as 'the speed of light' is, 
> rather, the 'rate' at which consciousness traverses this atemporal 
> electromagnetic 'space-time matrix' that we refer to as the cosmos 
> [which itself is another example of limited thinking]. That 'rate of 
> traversal' itself raises various rather interesting considerations.
> Best regards,
> Grahame
> ----- Original Message -----
>
>     *From:* Wolfgang Baer <mailto:wolf at nascentinc.com>
>     *To:* Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion
>     <mailto:general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
>     *Sent:* Sunday, May 07, 2017 9:46 PM
>     *Subject:* Re: [General] HA: Gravity
>
>     Grahame:
>
>     My computer did some funny things and just found your response and
>     paper, will read and comment, sounds interesting.
>
>     regarding your comments:
>
>     To Grahame: We are so used to causality and computer symbols that
>     we write m*a = F and think F causes acceleration. But mathematical
>     equations express a condition. The dAlambert principle expresses
>     Newtons law as  0= F - ma or 0 = F + Fa , This should be read as
>     the condition not a causal equation. Physical material  can only
>     happen where all forces are zero. No causality. Therefore simply a
>     structural condition on possible configurations of a Block
>     Universe. In that sense everything already exists we just become
>     aware of the part we call Now as we move through it.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at Wolf at nascentinc.com
> <a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
> Click here to unsubscribe
> </a>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20170508/6a888e03/attachment.htm>