[General] CLASSICAL,QUANTUM MECHANICS
Wolfgang Baer
wolf at nascentinc.com
Wed May 9 12:13:33 PDT 2018
Andre:
Have you heard of resonance antennas . These are dynamic antennas that
expand the effective antenna size so it can capture energy from a much
larger crossection. It is a near field phenomena discovered and used in
small transistor radios, and nano wires
If it had been known in the 1900 we would probably not have invented
photons.
Let me know if interested and I can dig up some references
WOlf
Dr. Wolfgang Baer
Research Director
Nascent Systems Inc.
tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
E-mail wolf at NascentInc.com
On 5/6/2018 12:43 PM, André Michaud wrote:
>
> Dear Wolfgang,
>
> Thank you for your appreciation.
>
> I'll answer inline for consistency.
>
> Best Regards
> ---
> André Michaud
> GSJournal admin
> http://www.gsjournal.net/
> https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2740-5684
> http://www.srpinc.org/
>
>
>
> On Sun, 6 May 2018 10:56:11 -0700, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
>
> Andre:
>
> your paper "The Hydrogen Atom Fundamental Resonance States" available
> at the site below is indeed a great work of interest. After a very
> brief review let me ask is I have this right
>
> You are claiming the quantum jumps can be calculated as continuous
> electromagnetic interactions
>
> This is what Schrödinger was planning to promote by introducing the
> wave function, in agreement with de Broglie.
>
> I also am convinced that transitions between stationary states are
> continuously progressive resonance processes. Energy transfer via
> resonance processes are known to happen and have been mathematized
> (Förster resonance transfers for example).
>
> If electrons really are in resonance states as de Broglie concluded,
> It think that there is no inconsistency with considering that
> bremmsstrahlung electromagnetic photons could be emitted by means of
> such progressive processes, and that the transitions between
> stable/metastable states could be directly linked via such emission.
>
> Actually, if nobody tackles this issue before I become knowledgeable
> enough to do it myself, this is exactly where I am eventually headed.
>
> That "electromagnetic bremsstrahlung photons could be defined as
> self-sustaining their own motion in a localized manner without the
> need for any underlying ether, from the simple interaction of their
> own internal mutually inducing E and B fields"End section 1.
>
>
> If electromagnetic bremmsstrahlung photons are emitted via such
> progressive continuous mechanical processes, given that the Kaufman
> experiment and the relation that Marmet discovered between the
> relativistic mass increment and the energy of the electron magnetic
> field, then such bremmsstrahlung photons can only be electromagnetic
> in nature by definition. If they have a such an intrinsic magnetic
> field, then they also have a matching intrinsic electric field. To be
> consistent with Maxwell, they have to mutually induce each other,
> which means that they are of default equal density by structure.
>
> This very structure, from considerations drawn from the work of
> Kaurman and Marmet mandates that half their total complement of energy
> be its momentum energy propelling the other electromagnetic half that
> oscillates electromagnetically transversally (to be consistent with
> Maxwell).
>
> By "localized manner" Does this mean a self contained E, B field that
> imposes its own boundary conditions?
>
>
> Actually, the E and B fields are "mathematical representations" of the
> intensity/density of the "really physically existing energy" of which
> the physically existing bremmsstrahlung photon is made that we use to
> "measure" the really existing energy. It has to be the actual
> "physically existing energy" that oscillates in a self-sustaining
> manner. The E and B fields are only mathematical representations that
> allow us to think about this energy and to calculate it.
>
> When you say without "ether" does this mean without space ? Or are the
> fields still conceived as propagating in some space.
>
> The Ether was conceived of as an underlying substance that would be
> the "material" that would materially oscillate and transmit Maxwell's
> EM waves as he conceived them. But if electromagnetic bremmsstrahlung
> photons self-sustain their own motion, there is no need any more for
> the very concept of "ether".
>
> Of course these photons would still propagate in vacuum, but don't
> need any underlying "ether" to transmit them. They auto-propel at the
> default equilibrium speed of light in empty vacuum, so to speak.
>
> Space, vacuum, to me is only the empty vacuum in which all that we can
> observe exists, whatever it might be.
>
> André
>
> WOlf
>
> Dr. ;
> Wolfgang Baer
> Research Director
> Nascent Systems Inc.
> tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
> E-mailwolf at NascentInc.com
> On 5/6/2018 1:52 AM, Andrew Meulenberg wrote:
>> Dear Andre,
>> Thank you for providing the link to your paper. I'm only 1/10 the way
>> thru it and have already found 1/2 dozen points (with references)
>> that are important bases to my views of physics. It is nice to know
>> that some of them have historical precedent. I have 2 papers, which I
>> need to publish, that can use yours as a reference.
>> Andrew M.
>> _ _ _
>> On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 11:53 PM, André Michaud <srp2 at srpinc.org
>> <mailto:srp2 at srpinc.org>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Wolfgang,
>>
>> To your first question,
>>
>> From equation (5-22) and afferent text, page 132 in reference
>> "Quantum Physics of Atoms, Molecules, Solids, Nuclei, and
>> Particles - Second edition", by R. Eisberg and R.Resnick,
>> Schrödinger's equation had an imaginary part from the get go.
>>
>> Initially, Schrödinger meant the wave function to represent a
>> resonance volume within which the localized electron remained
>> captive when in bound state:
>>
>> http://file.scirp.org/Html/17-7503469_84158.htm
>> <http://file.scirp.org/Html/17-7503469_84158.htm>
>>
>> Best Regards
>>
>> André
>>
>>
>> ---
>> André Michaud
>> GSJournal admin
>> http://www.gsjournal.net/
>> https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2740-5684
>> <https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2740-5684>
>> http://www.srpinc.org/
>>
>> On Sat, 5 May 2018 19:25:17 -0700, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
>>
>> Two questions:
>>
>> 1) Nina Sotina's paper in The Vigier 10 proceedings points out
>> something that has puzzled me for a long time. Schroedinger's
>> 1926 paper introducing the Wave function was a real classic
>> function not an imaginary. In october 1926 Von Madelung derived a
>> classic hydrodynamic formulation of quantum theory but did so
>> from the Schroedinger equation with an imaginary wave function.
>> Both Schroedinger's and Madelung's derivation suggests they
>> thought QM waves were real, an interpretation, which I tend to favor.
>>
>> Were and who introduced the imaginary?
>>
>> 2) Along those lines I just ran into
>>
>> THE GRAND UNIFIED THEORY OF CLASSICAL QUANTUM MECHANICS by Dr.
>> Randell Mills
>>
>> The guy knows a lot of physics and claims he can explain the
>> results of quantum theory from purely classical physics.
>>
>> His claim that the electron is a charge shell rather than a
>> probability is similar to my CAT theory, only my rational is to
>>
>> analyze quantum theory as a mental projection of the observer
>> i.e. as the physics of the observer.
>>
>> Is this guy a bullshitter? Anyone heard of him?
>>
>> http://brilliantlightpower.com/theory-overview/
>> <http://brilliantlightpower.com/theory-overview/>
>>
>> Theory Overview:
>>
>> The claim that classic physics “ only the simple laws of Newton’s
>> Mechanics, Maxwell’s equations of electricity, magnetism, and
>> electrodynamics, and the fundamental constants of nature” are
>> adequate to explain “All observables from quarks to cosmos … in
>> closed-form analytical expressions containing fundamental
>> constants only.”
>>
>> “According to Mills GUT-CP, nature is classical. Electrons, when
>> bound in an atom, are considered to be discrete two-dimensional
>> spherical membranes of charge and current that completely
>> surround the nucleus as a bubble.”
>>
>> “Mills GUT-CP is a /confirmable/ theory, … Data sets include the
>> electron spin, g-factor, ionization energies of 1-20 electron
>> atoms and ions (400 states); the state lifetimes and line
>> intensities of hydrogen; the excited states of helium; the
>> excited states of H2, the relationships between the masses of
>> fundamental particles; the bond distances, energies, angles, and
>> dipole moments of over 800 molecules; and the parameters of a
>> variety of extended solids. From the molecular theory, Brilliant
>> Light Power has launched a molecular modeling subsidiary,
>> Millsian Inc <http://www.millsian.com/>.
>>
>> “ The essence of GUTCP is that every solution is for the true or
>> real source of the observable wherein any solution of an
>> observable as the inherent information for all observables that
>> can be related to that observable.”
>>
>> *Here is a a site to down load his book*
>>
>> *http://brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/theory/GUT-CP-2016-Ed-Book-Web-121517.pdf
>> <http://brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/theory/GUT-CP-2016-Ed-Book-Web-121517.pdf>*
>>
>> --
>> Wolfgang Baer
>> Nascent Systems Inc.
>> 380W. Carmel Valley Rd.
>> Carmel Valley, CA 93924 USA
>> Wolf at NascentInc.com <mailto:Support at NascentInc.com>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of
>> Light and Particles General Discussion List at srp2 at srpinc.org
>> <mailto:srp2 at srpinc.org>
>>
>> Click here to unsubscribe
>> <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/srp2%40srpinc.org?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of
>> Light and Particles General Discussion List at mules333 at gmail.com
>> <mailto:mules333 at gmail.com>
>> <a
>> href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/mules333%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1
>> <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/mules333%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1>">
>> Click here to unsubscribe
>> </a>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20180509/e368b92a/attachment.html>
More information about the General
mailing list