[General] Fwd: Fwd: Re: Velocity of Gravitation

Thu Feb 21 15:00:56 PST 2019

Albrecht and Richard:

The linkhttps://michaeltellinger.com/michaels-articles/particle-wave-duality/  

Is for an article , which in my opinion is a bit too conspiracy and 
anti- establishment for its own sake

I do like "“The fractal-multi-dimentional-toroidal-nature of reality”." 
but quite frankly any visualization of physics built of cyclic coordinates,
  like Heisenberg's quantum theory would be a multidimensional toroid.

The video in the video has a demonstration of a floating "something" 
that is very curious. Anyone know how this was done?
Or is there a paper that describes what is going on, or any verification 
experiment.

Frankly Tellinger sounds like a con-man , but so do a lot of people and 
someone may have something.

Magnetis: A question that has been on my mind since reading Sciama's 
explanation of inertia

If Magnetism and or Inertia is a phenomena based on relative velocity is 
there an effect that decreases as 1/r rather than 1/(r^2 ) which sciama 
hints at.

What makes it reasonable is that the angular distance decreases as 1/r 
so an effect that is related to a displacement rather than a radial 
distance from an observer could decrease by 1/r

Wolfgang Baer

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	Fwd: Re: [General] Velocity of Gravitation
Date: 	Thu, 21 Feb 2019 10:57:38 -0800
From: 	Wolfgang Baer <wolf at nascentinc.com>
Organization: 	Nascent Systems Inc.
To: 	Nascent Systems Inc. <support at Nascentinc.om>

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	Re: [General] Velocity of Gravitation
Date: 	Wed, 20 Feb 2019 13:57:13 +0100
From: 	Albrecht Giese <phys at a-giese.de>
Reply-To: 	Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion 
<general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
To: 	general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org

Hello all,

thank you, Richard, for the link. I have looked into the video of
Michael Tellinger, and I have found surprising thoughts. Examples:

1) Electrons are toroidal shapes of fields; and fields are in his
understanding primary things, not caused by kind of charges
2) The most important fields are magnetic fields; they are caused by
sounds; such sounds seem to fill the whole universe
3) The torus shape of these fields originates the shapes of many objects
in nature; for instance are the shapes of flowers caused by these
sound-created shapes of magnetic toroidal fields
4) Also cone-shaped  objects are frequent in nature; for instance our
brain has a lot of cone-shaped components; and all cones in the world
seem to be connected in a way and have a kind of communication with each
other
5) He shows a toroidal stone in his presentation; which looks like a
simple stone but is able to do funny things like making computers in the
vicinity to crash.

Is this a new physical world?

Albrecht (quite surprised about this)

Am 19.02.2019 um 06:44 schrieb Richard Gauthier:
> Hello all,
>      Here’s an interesting website including a you-tube presentation proposing an alternative view of gravity as a magneto-electric phenomenon, which would have revolutionary implications if its practical anti-gravity demonstrations can be confirmed. It’s at https://michaeltellinger.com/michaels-articles/particle-wave-duality/  . He  proposes torus models of electrons and atoms based on magneto-electric resonance effects.
>         Richard
>
>> On Feb 16, 2019, at 3:28 PM, Wolfgang Baer <wolf at nascentinc.com>  wrote:
>>
>> List and Ludwik:
>>
>> questions regarding the  speed of gravity is closely associated to ones model of an "ether"
>>
>> Ludwik Kostro has written an excellent history of Einsteins thinking regarding the nature of space
>>
>> And with this E-mail I am hoping he will share his "Einstein and the ether" book with us.
>>
>> I do not believe any questions of gravity speed can be addressed without taking a stand on the ether question.
>>
>> As some of you may know My own hypothesis is that we must include the observer directly in physics and I think a good case can be made that we conscious systems are fundamentally a space of activity i.e. a self containing ether. That questions of  the speed of light or gravity are directly related to the speed of our individual speed of Now. Having read Ludwik's book I believe Einstein came to the same conclusion but simply could not let go of the independent of ourselves  space concept.
>>
>> wolf
>>
>> Dr. Wolfgang Baer
>> Research Director
>> Nascent Systems Inc.
>> tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
>> E-mail wolf at NascentInc.com
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at richgauthier at gmail.com
>> <a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/richgauthier%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
>> Click here to unsubscribe
>> </a>
> _______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at phys at a-giese.de
> <a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/phys%40a-giese.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
> Click here to unsubscribe
> </a>

---
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

_______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List atWolf at nascentinc.com
<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
Click here to unsubscribe
</a>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20190221/f35f8d92/attachment.html>