[General] Can cyclic-photon electrons better describe superconductivity?

[Richard Gauthier]

Hi Dan,
   Thanks for sharing your real name. 

   Most if not all of the models of an electron as a cycling photon-like object or other circulating wave-like object on this discussion list are for an electron moving in free space. My internally-superluminal relativistic quantum-vortex electron model and related double-helix photon model are described in the article 
Quantum-entangled superluminal double-helix photon produces a relativistic superluminal quantum-vortex zitterbewegung electron and positron <http://www.academia.edu/attachments/57862769/download_file?s=portfolio> at https://richardgauthier.academia.edu/research. I’ll have another article soon with more details for the relativistic electron model. For example, I found that for BOTH the resting quantum-vortex electron model and the very highly relativistic quantum-vortex electron model (as gamma -> infinity), its  minimum internal speed is calculated to be c and its maximum internal superluminal speed is calculated to be c sqrt(5)= 2.236c, although the maximum and minimum speeds vary in an interesting way between these two electron speeds.

We are open to suggestions, comments and questions.

     all the best,
           Richard


> On Mar 20, 2019, at 5:04 PM, DataPacRat <datapacrat at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I'm still reading up on several peoples' approaches to electrons being
> made of cycling photons, but the lack of consistent terms between the
> different authours is making it hard for me to Google for further
> elaborations. For example, has any modelling been done on how
> electrons of this sort behave while superconducting? That is, does
> this model offer any testable predictions beyond that of the
> classical, single-point particle model of an electron?
> 
> 
> (PS: I've been asked to share my real name on this list. It's Daniel
> Eliot Boese, though I've been using DataPacRat since '01, and it's my
> preferred nom-de-net.)
> 
> Thank you for your time,
> --
> Dan Boese, aka DataPacRat
> "Does aₘᵢₙ=2c²/Θ ? I don't know, but wouldn't it be fascinating if it were?"
> _______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at richgauthier at gmail.com
> <a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/richgauthier%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
> Click here to unsubscribe
> </a>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20190320/b56fa2ac/attachment.html>